Iran Election Guide

Donate to EAWV





Or, click to learn more

Search

« The Latest on Israel-Palestine (8 March): Fayyad Resigns | Main | The Great Republican Hope: Mr Rush Limbaugh »
Saturday
Mar072009

Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?

Related Post: Obama: Finding the Right Word for Russia

lostinspaceExperts, policy makers, and academics have been talking about hypothetical military combat in space for decades, particularly during the 1980s with the introduction of President Reagan's so-called "Star Wars" program to shoot down Soviet nuclear missiles. However, there's evidence to suggest that warfare in Earth's orbit is very quickly accelerating from merely hypothetical to a strategic reality.

This week Russian Deputy Defense Minister Gen. Valentin Popovkin revealed that his country has been developing Anti-Satellite weapons technology, particularly "basic, key elements" needed to shoot down a satellite in near earth orbit. Regarding similar programs by the Americans and Chinese, Popovkin said, "We can't sit back and quietly watch others doing...such work."

Of course the Russians would have to emulate any military program that both the US and China have, but this isn't your everyday imperial arms race. They think the US already shot down one of their satellites.

Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Leonid Shershnev, a former head of Russia's military space intelligence, said in an interview published by the Moskovsky Komsomolets newspaper on Tuesday that the U.S. satellite involved in the [February 10, 2009 collision with a defunct Russian satellite]  was used by the U.S. military as part of the "dual-purpose" Orbital Express research project, which began in 2007.

It's not unusual for the Russians to be suspicious about DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) projects, especially ones like Orbital Express that could eventually be used against them. But the real indicators of a US "shoot down" comes from the satellite's manufacturer, Iridium Satellite LLC, which could serve the dual purpose of both telecommunications provider and military intelligence asset.

Iridium Satellite started in the late 1990s as one of many companies competing in the burgeoning field of satellite telecommunications. However, due to technical issues and rampant mismanagement, Iridium filed for bankruptcy and seemed on the brink of disaster. That's when a private group of investors stepped in and bought Iridium and it's $6 billion in assets for the bargain basement price of $25 million. Almost simultaneously Iridium announced a $36 million, no-bid contract with the Department of Defense for providing satellite communications to some 20,000 users.

Who sits on the board of this once-broke, now uberprofitable company? None other than Alvin Krongard, better known as Buzzy, former Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency under the disagraced George Tenet and board member of the private security contractor formerly known as Blackwater.

If I can find all of that on Google, what do you suppose the Russians know? No wonder they're developing their own military space technology.

Counter-Point: Dan Mosqueda isn't so sure the US shot down the satellite. Via Twitter, he says "This conjunction was a result of sloppy Russian space ops. An Iridium bird [satellite] isn't an Orbital Express bird, not even close in size. OE was launched via an Atlas V - HUGE launch vehicle. Iridiums were launched on smaller and completely different Delta-family launch vehicles. Last launch was back in 2002. The ASTRO is at 250 miles [from the earth's surface], Iridium at 450, and the Cosmos 2251 is at 490, but could have decayed a bit. So ASTRO is out of the picture."

References (124)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: russia information
    [...]EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?[...]
  • Response
    Thank you for another great article. Where else could anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.
  • Response
    Response: VLeXUzpP
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?
  • Response
    Response: TFxcCHHf
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?
  • Response
    Response: uniga.com.mk
    wow this looks pretty nice, im in the photography field myself since several years (you can check some of my works here : wedding photographers) and I can tell you this is some really good word, I really like your style very much. keep it up
  • Response
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?
  • Response
    Response: well nanoo
    I am running a small computer repair business in rural Ireland and would like to expand into doing low small, low cost, high quiltiy wordpress brochure websites for other small businesses.. . How can I find outsourcing partners abroad, that I can just simply email the content to, and have them ...
  • Response
    I want to start my own blog: are there such thing as blogs that are totally "open", and anybody can view it? I keep coming to the kind where you have to add other "friends" to use the site. . Links appreciated. Thanks!.
  • Response
    How can I find cheap, reliable wordpress web designers that I can out source my webdesign work to?
  • Response
    Response: best seo company
    What is your opinion of personal blogs and online journaling?
  • Response
    I know where the images from the blog posts are, but don't know where to look for the blog posts in my backups. Can you help? Hope it's not a silly question..
  • Response
    I like to collect information from various sites. There are time when I like few points while reading a site. I would like to blog my findings. Will I face a copyright issue if i directly copy paste the few points from other sites? I have seen the usage of "source". ...
  • Response
    What are Mark Zuckerberg's blog posts in the movie "The Social Network"?
  • Response
    I want to put the advertisements in blogger, so I can get payments?.
  • Response
    Response: zovi coupons
    How to apply for google adsense account for my all 3 blogs and 2 websites ?
  • Response
    Pulitzer prize stuff present.
  • Response
    ive got alot of free time on my hands recently, so ive decided to start blogging again, . . does anybody know any good blogging sites which are free and easy to use?? (apart from tumbr and blogger/google ). . thanks (:.
  • Response
    I am planning to move to Australia permanently. Hopefully, my immigration process will be completed this year and I will move in the beginning of 2011. Can someone suggest some excellent resources and blogs about making the plans for settling in Australia?.
  • Response
    Does Joomla have a Component that help to create a forum like Yahoo Answers?.
  • Response
    For example,a movie's download link or a book's ed2k links?.
  • Response
    Response: seo consulting
    I would like to start a jobs website using Joomla or Wordpress. Is this possible?
  • Response
    I need specific instructions on how to link my blog effectively. Should my blog be based on my website, or can I add to blogs on related sites? I am pretty lost right now, I basically need a blogging tour guide for dummies.
  • Response
    How can creative writing be taught in a standardized way?
  • Response
    Response: five stars
    I'd see all kinds of ads about blogging on the Internet to earn money, but don't know of anybody that has actually made any money this way. I'd love to hear from anybody who has..
  • Response
    Response: website submission
    Where or what would I have to do? And what's the cost?.
  • Response
    Response: investment
    I am thinking about building a local news website that will, for the most part, be a collection of local news stories published by newspapers and other sources. Is it legal to do this? I would, of course, give all credit to the authors. I'm just wondering what the legality of ...
  • Response
    Is it necessary to get the copyright of the game content developed individualy before publication?
  • Response
    Will computer engineers in the philippines be able to have a licensure exam?
  • Response
    Response: Pizza Hut coupons
    If I take an entire article from WIKIA with informations, script especially and I post it on my site, translating the infos into my language, is this a problem? the scripts from WIKIA are copyrighted or smth or there is a way they could close my site?.
  • Response
    I want to create a blogspot of my own and want to earn some money from that. Is possible?.
  • Response
    I want to start my own blog but I want a free blogging site that I can video blog on but I also want to be able to do a text blogs on it to? Does anyone know a good site for this?.
  • Response
    How could I write blogs or articles and get paid for it?
  • Response
    Why does Firefox not work since I downloaded yahoo instant messenger?
  • Response
    Response: company website
    can anyone give me copyright guidelines pertaining to getting articles from other sites.?
  • Response
    Response: lost car keys
    Is using a copyright material as a reference to write articles illegal?
  • Response
    How does blogging/setting up a blog help a small to meduim size business grow?
  • Response
    How much blog traffic will affect to my blog if I convert my blog name with different domain name?
  • Response
    I want to be able to use my gmail account to forward blog posts to people, but for some reason Thunderbird keeps forcing me to use my college e-mail. Is there a way to change this?.
  • Response
    How do I make my joomla made website be online?
  • Response
    Response: seo monterrey
    How to ban a person from a blog on blogspot?
  • Response
    I am a little confused on exactly how I would make money by blogging, I mean who pay me and how, once I blog who come to my page and how do I get them there. I really appreciate if some one could break it down for me.. . Thanks!.
  • Response
    Response: cat grooming
    How do I export my Blogspot blogs to my Weebly blog?
  • Response
    Response: gold iras
    I have a MacBook computer and I want my pictures that are on my computer to be on my Motorola Razr 2 v9. I have a memory card and a memory card adapter. When I put the card in the adapter, the computer recognizes it. And the pictures that I have ...
  • Response
    Response: ira
    Right on my man!
  • Response
    What computer software were computers using before Microsoft was invented? I googled it and couldn't find any info on it. Thanks and no jokes or dissing please..
  • Response
    Response: skateboard decks
    Confused about Copyright policies from sites that let you 'digg' articles?
  • Response
    Response: aquarium
    Can a computer virus passively infect the computer by just being online?
  • Response
    Response: cosequin
    i am setting up A web portal for my business. and i want to know the copyright guidelines, specifically the legality of copying other articles from other websites. in other words, is it ok to copy an article from another site and paste it in my site ( of course, i ...
  • Response
    Hi All,. . I am creating a website for overseas students who are in Australia and those who are thinking of applying a student visa to Australia. (fyi, website will be in the local language).. . I have found a PDF file on the Australian Embassy website advising how to apply ...
  • Response
    How can I prevent my blogspot from showing up in search engines?
  • Response
    Response: ira's
    May I use Wikipedia content in my blog without violating the copyright law?
  • Response
    My ideas precisely!
  • Response
    Response: march madness 2014
    How come Firefox displays a weird character when it should show a word?
  • Response
    Response: made my day
    What is blogspot when it comes to live streaming football?
  • Response
    Where can I find legitimate blogs that are focused on or at least delve seriously into penis enlargement?
  • Response
    Response: experienced
    How do you get your blog published on the Amnesty International site?
  • Response
    Response: Roofer Dublin
    Hi there. I was just wondering why its such a big thing these days to have a ridiculous amount of ram in a computer? People tell me that the more Ram you have in your computer the faster your computer will be. I always thought that it was the processor that ...
  • Response
    Response: go to this site
    How do i use frame or iframe to put facebook or else to blogspot?
  • Response
    Response: seo services tens
    I am new to blog subscriptions and I am looking for an easy reader that is nice and organized that lets me view my blogs from my homepage or has a little scrollbox that is always up on the side of the computer screen. I started to use bloglines but it ...
  • Response
    How long can my computer keep running with an outdated browser?. I browser my computer is outdated. However my computer's little outdated too, and doesn't have what it would need to run the new browser. Should I start saving up for a new one, or can this problem be dealt with ...
  • Response
    Response: drug legislation
    Hi,. . I want to know can I use content from websites like Microsoft or apple or similar to write technical articles or is it violation of copyright law?. . Thank you.
  • Response
    Response: previous
    I have a degree in psychology, which I have found to be useless. And I am planning on going back to school and getting a Masters in Creative Writing, because I enjoy writing and would love to learn more techniques to make myself a better writer. I am worried, however, that ...
  • Response
    The top quality underserved students work around
  • Response
    Confused about Copyright policies from sites that let you 'digg' articles?
  • Response
    How is it possible posting a blog in a classified sites ?
  • Response
    How do I export my Blogspot blogs to my Weebly blog?
  • Response
    A logo, accompanying punch line and rest of the content of a portal needs to be secured against any republication or use by any other party..
  • Response
    How to make old computer a client of new vista computer?
  • Response
    Response: one-time offer
    I see in my blog trackers significant traffic coming from facebook. My blog is not connected with facebook, I don't have an account there, and I can't see, who posts the links...any ideas?.
  • Response
    I bought a brand new hp computer over a month ago. Is turning it off every night bad for the computer or should the computer be left on 24-7. I have heard both ways. Any computer techs answers would be appreciated..
  • Response
    I have a domain name bought, but i havent had time to make the website look nice. i want to forward the website url to my blogspot blog for the time being. how do i do this?.
  • Response
    Response: check this out
    How do I configure my computer to be able to act as a server (host) for my second computer using crossover?
  • Response
    What's the best way to copyright a website and all its contents? Copyright poetry?
  • Response
    Should I start a blog or website for addiction/recovery related information?
  • Response
    What is the best blogging platform for a podcast or a video blog?
  • Response
    Response: www.youtube.com
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?
  • Response
    Response: this site
    I would like to save all my blog posts on wordpress ?
  • Response
    Response: special info
    I just installed a new itunes on a different computer, and I want to manually sync some videos to my ipod. What I need to know if if I plug my ipod into the computer(which is FILLED with my music) will it start to synchronize right away to the empty itunes ...
  • Response
    Response: why not check here
    I want to create my own website but I have no experience. A classmate recommended me to instead create a blog so that I can get experience. . What free blog site should I use?. Any tips?.
  • Response
    I wanna start a website about fantasy sports. I have lots of ideas for content..
  • Response
    Response: killer deal
    I am looking for a great blogging website, but there are just too many! I am actually looking for a website that's free and there can be many bloggers on one site. For example, I created a blog and people who I choose (friends and family) can easily start blogging on ...
  • Response
    What is a good free blogging website that I can respond to blogs and others will respond to me?
  • Response
    Response: bonuses
    I was thinking of publishing or posting online some of my articles I've written for school but can't afford to copyright them. If they are in my school paper, do I hold any ownership over them or are they protected by law?.
  • Response
    How hard is it to import a custom made Joomla template into Joomla?
  • Response
    Response: tecnicas seo
    go here for best posicionamiento web anywhere
  • Response
    Response: find out here now
    How do I post to my wordpress blog from my desktop, without 3rd party software?
  • Response
    Response: que es el seo
    go here for greatest seo posicionamiento around
  • Response
    Response: la seo
    go here for best motor de busqueda google around
  • Response
    Are there any good schools where you could double major journalism and creative writing?
  • Response
    I want to pursue a major in creative writing, and eventually become a fiction writer, but my question is, besides teaching english (which I NEVER picture myself doing), what is there for someone with a creative writing degree to do before they have written any books. My mom says a degree ...
  • Response
    Response: fundraising ideas
    What is the best way to search for blogs you are interested in?
  • Response
    Also, what degrees (if anyone) would be required to be an independent creative writing teacher?.
  • Response
    Response: Seo Service
    I have written several articles and posted them on internet article directories. All directories I have posted on state that if others wish to use the article they must place the author's link/s along with the article. I have found a website that used my article and did not give me ...
  • Response
    Response: check my blog
    What are the laws as to using company logos in blog posts?
  • Response
    Response: visit them now
    Can a blog really be that helpful? What type of content should a business blog have? If there are any blog experts out there please help me out. What are some good companies to set up a blog with? And any other general/specific information on setting up a blog for a ...
  • Response
    I have just gotten a blog on blogspot. People comment me and I was wondering how you comment back to them without e-mailing or going to their blog. .
  • Response
    Response: terry robe
    If I want to use a font that says it's for personal use only, would it be ok to use on blogger? Also, I don't know if getting Google Adsense would make a difference..
  • Response
    It seems like the internet is where it's at. I studied Computer Information and Film/Video at school, but I'm not too shabby with a keyboard when it comes to writing interesting stuff. Does anyone know of anyone (aside from Drudge and Arianna Huffington) who has been able to make a few ...
  • Response
    Response: insurance
    I want to major in either English Literature, Creative Writing or English with a minor/concentration in Creative Writing..
  • Response
    How do I copyright the content on my web site?
  • Response
    Im based in London have worked as a secretary for more than 10 years and have an HND in Business Studies but am tired of admin work and office politics and would like to do something more creative- change careers.. . I write in my spare time and have attended an ...
  • Response
    Response: sex toys
    I have many setting in my previous windows in Mozila Firefox, now I've installed an onother version of windows on other hardisk.. What should I copy to have the same settings, history and bookmarks from the earlier one?. Nothing is lost I just have an onother windows in another hard and ...
  • Response
    Hi all! I want to have my own website let's say i will purchase it through Godaddy and for designing part i want to use joomla. I have gone through guidance file given within joomla setup but still m confused in how to link my domain name and joomla?. Pls help ...
  • Response
    click here for best seo en barcelona available
  • Response
    get best internet work available
  • Response
    I opened up a blogspot website and when I closed it 15 or so new windows opened back up to the same site. Why did that happen? Was it a virus?. Will it hurt my computer? How do I find it and get rid of it? I am running 2 virus ...
  • Response
    Response: noindex file
    If I set up my own blogging web site. Is it okay to copy and paste pics on my site to suppour my blogging?
  • Response
    Is there a service available that geotags blog posts while on the go and is able to post to map with others?
  • Response
    Response: cooking utensils
    What is online blogging and how do people make money out of it?
  • Response
    click here for top quality what is whole life insurance available
  • Response
    The best cat arthritis available
  • Response
    The greatest term vs whole life insurance around
  • Response
    Response: experto seo
    go here for top quality como posicionarse en google around
  • Response
    Response: Recommended Site
    Other than blogger what are good blog sites teens can use?
  • Response
    get top quality cheap term life insurance available
  • Response
    The top quality posicionamiento en buscadores around
  • Response
    go here for best signs of dog with arthritis available
  • Response
    I have a Blogspot blog, and I want that any time I publish a new post on my blog, a link to the new post will automatically be added to my Facebook news feed. Is there anyway to do this?.
  • Response
    Just bought a new laptop, not sure whether there is a way to take firefox bookmarks from old laptop to new laptop.. . Thanks..
  • Response
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?
  • Response
    Response: Ebon Talifarro
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?
  • Response
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?
  • Response
    Response: get accessories
    "[...]EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?[...]"
  • Response
    Response: cheap led signs
    EA WorldView - Archives: March 2009 - Space War: Russia and US in Satellite Shoot-out?

Reader Comments (13)

Obama and Co. are big on solar power, and I know they are looking into the potential of space farms. Japan has been carrying out research, and the Russians might be thinking about it as well.
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2007/10/beam_me_down_sc.html I think it's one of the reasons they want space-based weapons -- to protect the infrastructure. Imagine a Chinese anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon (which is basically a bomb) taking out one of these things 50 years from now. Talk about an energy crisis! The Soviet Union deployed a satellite equipped with a hidden anti-aircraft cannon in the 1960s. Nobody found out about it until after the Cold War ended. I saw a picture of it in Popular Science.

http://energycentral.fileburst.com/EnergyBizOnline/2008-5-sep-oct/Tech_Frontier_Solar_Space.pdf

March 7, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDave

Hi Scott:
I'm not going to post here except to say the following:

1) There are some serious oversights in Mr. Mull's analysis.
2) The collision is far more deleterious to America's national interests than all the rest of the world's nations combined, at this point. I suggest even a cursory read of the consequences of the uncontrolled debris propagation generated by the collision.
3) To "announce" that space war is "becoming" more prevalent or portentious is rather odd, given what has been going on there for many years. The signs diagnostic of mounting urgency and strategic integration of space not merely as a resource for planetary operations, but as a theater of operations in its own right, are, at best, tangentially implicated in considerations of the recent satellite collision.

I wish to remain tactful. Mr. Mull calls our attention to an important contemporary issue that is rapidly ascending in its urgency. However, the reason he cites/invokes as warranting our increased attention is, I must opine, profoundly misconceived.

Dr. Charles E. Gannon
author, Rumors of War and Infernal Machines: Technomilitary Agenda Setting in American and British Speculative Fiction

March 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDr. Charles E. Gannon

Dr. Gannon,

Thank you for your comment. I want to point out that I never actually said/confirmed that the US shot down a Russian satellite, I only drew a line from the satellite to US clandestine operations for the purposes of showing that there COULD be more to this story than a simple collision. I have no proof that the US shot down the satellite, and you have no proof that they did not. Therefore, I'd say speculation is allowed.

If you don't think the possibility of an actual aggressive move in space warrants attention, I would really like to know what would. Shall we wait until someone DIES in space? What's your threshold for paying attention to a conflict?

March 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJosh Mull

Scott wrote:

"If you don’t think the possibility of an actual aggressive move in space warrants attention, I would really like to know what would. Shall we wait until someone DIES in space? What’s your threshold for paying attention to a conflict?"

My response is, firstly, that my attention is directly proportional to, and determined by, the factors which would best seem to predict whether, in fact, this *event* is an "actual aggressive move" or an example of carelessness and neglect in orbital/launch/maintenance operations and planning. I consider the factors suggesting that this is NOT an "aggressive move" to be individually significant; taken as a whole rather than as the sum of their parts, they are, for me, decisive. The list of the most important (but not only) factors, follows:

One: the capability for kinetic kill (satellite to satellite) already operationally existed for, and was well understood by, Russia and the United States. Also, while not demonstrated in practice or analogous ops, it is hard to imagine that a similar capability is not fully within the operational palette of the ESA or China.

Two: this occurrence creates a navigation nightmare, with profound operational ramifications for the most space-dependent nations, and--from my contacts in the Airforce and Space Command--is a particularly terrible event for US strategic interests.

Three: lives and material destruction are very unlikely as the key indicators of an *emerging* test of wills or might in space. They would be consistent with a late-stage escalation--to the point of irreversible commitment to overt, offensive operations. Look for signals issues, service interruptions, marginal degradings, as the "opening gambits" or "shows of strength." As for this event signalling a "display of capabilities," see item #1, above.

In summary: a tiny ion-thruster fitted on any satellite that follows a similar orbital path (which is, in large measure, also altitude-specific) as that of a "target satellite" can be used to effect what the space military folks call "catastrophic intercept" (some like the rather gallows-humor term, "catastrophic rendezvous"). The number of satellites fitted with such thrusters--for perfectly legitimate station-keeping functions, but which have an obvious ability to "weaponize" the platform--number in the hundreds. Automated intercept of co-orbiting objects is not "difficult" for the "space-faring" powers--and they have wanted to avoid such events because of the operational nightmares they portend. If any power *were* to use this tactic aggressively, I would look for it coming from a minor or "new" space national space program that A) wanted to significantly erode the advantages enjoyed by the more developed national programs, and B) did not mind infuriating all of those nations in so doing.

In conclusion, I cannot see how this event was necessary, or even advisable, either as a show of capability or will. If it was an "act", I would suspect it to be the result of a "house coup" attempt to be trying to start a war predicated on a "manufactured incident", since it is a very poor strategic move: more akin to an admixture of what underlies the fictional events in "Seven Days of May" cross-fertilized with "The Sum of All Our Fears." As a genuine, cosidered, centrally-approved military action, it violates the principles of real politick that usually guide such initiatives.

And as to your initial "riposte"--"I want to point out that I never actually said/confirmed that the US shot down a Russian satellite"--I would in turn point out that I never claimed that you did say such a thing. I am simply observing that the reasons you adduce for intimating that the collision might in fact be diagnostic of a warlike policy decision are far less conclusive--or even likely--than your essay asserts.

With (cordial and *genuine*) respects,
Dr. Charles E. Gannon

March 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDr. Charles E. Gannon

Dr. Gannon,

My essay asserts that the Russians are developing anti-satellite technology, perhaps because they think the US shot down one of their satellites, and I offer a handful of reasons why they might think this. That's it. Whatever else you choose to read into it, that's on you, not me.

The post was not about US national interests in a space war, not about the physical consequences of a satellite collision, and not about rogue military personnel attacking the Russians. If you have theories about those things, please feel free to write about it.

And drop the "with all due respect" stuff, it's patronizing.

UPDATE: The comments section appears to be broken at the moment, so this is in response to the comment below by Dr. Gannon,

I don't understand what part of my analysis you disagree with. The Russians, not me, think the collision was a shoot-down, and I offered a few reasons, not all, not definitively, why they might think that. I'm not saying its true, I'm speculating as to WHY THE RUSSIANS MIGHT THINK its true. To disagree with my analysis would be to say Iridium being a US military asset headed by former CIA is not a reason for the Russians to speculate about a US "shoot down." That's fine, maybe it's a big coincidence, and maybe the Russians didn't consider that at all in their assessment, but that's not what you seem to be saying. It seems you're caught on the RUSSIAN claim of a US shoot-down.

The Russians say they are building anti-satellite technology, the Russians say they're worried about US anti-satellite capabilities, and the Russians say the US shot down a satellite. That's not my analysis, that's what the Russians said. Iridium did manufacture the satellite, it is connected to the US military, and it is headed by former US intelligence officials. Those are facts, not something I'm asserting.

I do not know enough about the technology to speculate on whether the Russian claim is true, which is why I personally avoided any technical aspects and even went so far as to update the piece to include relevant technical information contradicting the Russian claim from Mr. Mosqueda, formerly an employee of US Space Command who worked on the Orbital Express project.

So, which part specifically of my analysis do you disagree with? That the Russians might have considered Iridium in their shoot-down theory, or the satellite's connection to the US military and intelligence services is relevant to that theory? The rest of the piece is all facts or other people's analysis.

March 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJosh Mull

Dear Mr. Mull:

I hope to finish this thread here. There are five objects/counterpoints to your last post that I am afraid I must present.

Firstly, it was you who earlier (your first response) suggested I was representing your piece as asserting that the US shot down a Russian satellite, which I did not assert.

Secondly, you *now* object to what you consider my focus on the US program. In attempting a contrast with your actual work, you claim that "My essay asserts that the Russians are developing anti-satellite technology, perhaps because they think the US shot down one of their satellites." However, the great majority of *your* article is about what the *US* might have developed, or might be doing, in space.

Thirdly, in order to respond to your query about what would constitute grounds for alarm over an escalating space confrontation, I found itnecessary to consider the relevant details of the relevant programs. Those are the determinant factors. I am not particularly interested in focusing on the US program.

Fourth, I do not suspect nor propose rogue actions or anything equally outre'; I offer those as a caveat, and an indication that there are other alternative explanations, even some that are/seem wildly improbable. But I *do* want to acknowledge other alternatives.

Lastly, I did not address my closing to you with "due respects" but "genuine respects." Furthermore--and most importantly-- I meant it. I am not trying to be patronizing. I dsiagree strongly with your analysis. At the same time, I recognize and respect the energy and research it takes to analyze space issues. They are very detailed, multi-tiered, and the physical realities which govern them are often counter-intuitive, making policy analysis particularly tricky. I am sad that, despite my emphasis upon *genuine*, you took this to be some kind of attempt at a patronizing tone. I assure you, I did not mean it that way. If you look at some of my other posts on Enduring America, and Libertas, I think you will see that I neither flame nor patronize.

I will try one last time.

With *genuine* respect,

Dr. Charles E. Gannon

March 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDr. Charles E. Gannon

Dear Mr. Mull:
Thanks for the clarifications: I think we can come to successful conclusion, now.
As you now present the matter, my reservations are with two points:

1) I note with interest that the Russian commentator is "Maj. Gen. (Ret.) Leonid Shershnev, a former head of Russia’s military space intelligence". I differ with the presumption that he is the voice of "Russia" as you imply when you wrote (in your last response) that "The Russians say they are building anti-satellite technology, the Russians say they’re worried about US anti-satellite capabilities, and the Russians say the US shot down a satellite. That’s not my analysis, that’s what the Russians said." Point One: the Russians (their sitting command staff) has been saying this for years, just as we have said it about them, and we are both right. So, what you say is true--but it's nothing new. What makes it (ostensibly) "new" here is the collision.

However, the matter of the collision brings me to my second point: the significance of the collision was not derived from "what *the* Russians said" (to quote you). Rather, it was the comments of *a* Russian: a "retired General." He can indeed claim to have the prerequisite technological knowledge and strategic insight. However, presuming him to be an official voice of Russian perception as relates to the Kremlin's Space Defense initiatives would be somewhat akin to presuming that if retirees such as Norman Schwartzkopf or Wesley Clark said something about US military activity, we could take it as indicative of what "the Americans are thinking/doing." I do not see discriminating between these two different levels of attribution as a quibble: Shershnev is not the voice of Russian Space Defense policy-makers, particularly regarding an event which transpired after his tenure in their ranks. I will happily agree that *some Russians* no doubt think exactly as he does. OTOH, if it was THE Russians who thought that way, I can only say that Putin, Medvedev, and others have been very directly vocal about things such as missile defense shields, and the like. I suspect if they wanted to make a statement to the effect that Russia entertained a (unofficial or official) suspicion that this collision was actually a US display of anti-satellite capability, they would have made it manifestly clear to all of us. It is possible that Shershnev is a "back channel" communication mouthpiece for the Kremlin. I do not know what degree of connection/conformity he has with current Russian politicos and powercenters. However, if I had the time (I don't), and if I read Russian (not enough, and not in Cyrillic), I would go nosing about for other comments by him: I would not be surprised to find that he was an "old Cold-Warrior"--the possibility of which you allude to in your article. We have lots of them in the US, ascribing all manner of perfidy to Russia, which they presume remains secretly "Red" and committed to the destruction of the West in general and the US in particular. Shershnev might well be their Russian analog, even in vastly muted form: his analysis smacks of old Cold War habits of thought.

Which brings up the final item: is his assertion given more credibility by the Iridium-CIA connection? I remain profoundly unconvinced of this. Not because it is "coincidence". I completely agree with you, Mr. Mull, that the Buzzy-Iridium connection is probably not chance. After Carter compelled disclosure, the CIA (and other intel groups in the US) created all manner of "black box" operating arms, handily protected by being "private corporations" (therefore relieved of the onus of Congressional review) that just "happened" to be owned or steered by ex-Company employees. And, as many have said, when it comes to the Company, you are NEVER an "ex"-employee.
However, has Iridium's bird been used to "take out" a Russian satellite? That's where I must part company with the "urgency" implicit in the coverage/significance you feel warranted by Shershnev's remarks. My read on the CIA-Iridium connection is that the CIA scarfed up an immense suite of on-orbit assets, launched by private dollars, and is using those for any number of communications purposes (they are not designed for sensing, etc.). However, this frees CIA/DARPA/Space Command from having to dedicate budget to putting up such assets themselves: to the extent that this array of ex-Iridium satellites has been unofficially tasked (either directly or by lease) to exclusive government service, the government can shift the dollars it would have taken to build and launch those assets, and shift the resources to other projects.
My hypothesis, therefore: all is as it seems. Not very exciting--and therefore, a real downer for those seeking contention and conflict and the other things that drive the news cycle. The Iridium bird and the Russian bird were expended and/or malfunctioning and the expense (both fiscal and political) to prevent the collision was (if even assessed) probably deemed prohibitive. So the powers that be let the inevitable happen. Note that the Russians KNEW this was coming: there was inter-agency chatter beforehand. Look at the news releases: not a national incident, insofar as US/Russian leaders were concerned--except that, along with the EU, there was *some* discussion about how to prevent generating more, subsequent debris clouds and reducing the effects of this one. The ESA was pretty grim and accurate about assessing the operational problems and costs created by this bit of negilgence--which is what I do think it was. However, some news markets jumped on this "crash in space" because it was susceptible to easy misreading as a "crisis in the making"--and therefore, it got a place in the news cycle. And, because no one rose to the bait and the nations themselves all but yawned, it fell out of that news cycle like a brick down a well.

In conclusion, if the Iridium-CIA connection is not behind a purposeful collision, and the only person saying so is a retired Russian general who may or may not have an axe to grind, is it really *newsworthy*? Did Shershnev say what he said? Unquestionably. Are Iridium-CIA probably connected these days? A reasonable hypothesis. However, does the latter add enough credibility to Shershnev's comments to make them worth a second look? I must opine otherwise--and I have tried to include a "fast overview" of why I think Shershnev's suspicions are wrong--which is why there hasn't been a "story" developing over this. Because Shershnev is almost a lone voice--and is certainly not an official spokesperson. He is not "THE Russians"--and the collision in orbit would be a pointless demonstration of what everyone already knows can be achieved (which is why no one is thumping shoes on desks about it, which is in turn why it is not really a big story, I think). You asked me, in your response to my first comment: "What’s your threshold for paying attention to a conflict?" Most of my subsequent comments were offered in an attempt to methodically and responsibly answer that question. And in sum, my feeling is that there is almost no indication that this collision even begins to appraoch such a threshhold or warrants such a reaction. The reasons for this I have exhaustively set forth in the preceding posts.

I hope this makes my read of the event clearer. I had not intended to use this forum as a means of conducting such an analysis, and I thank you for the patience you have shown as I have commented upon yours, which--although I may not agree with it--brings important issues and commentary to light, and in an engaging and erudite manner. It has been a pleasure "batting around this ball" with you, Mr. Mull.

With appreciation for your work and investigative commitment,

Dr. Charles E. Gannon

March 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDr. Charles E. Gannon

Wouldn't the Russians want to develop (or at least conduct lab research) into/on anti-satellite technology anyway? I'm sure it has been ongoing since '91-'92 -- in the lab, if not atmospheric testing. US decision to withdraw from the ABM treaty was a clear sign that Bush and Co. wanted to move beyond arms control. US attempts at weaponising space and/or place satellites designed to be used for defence purposes sounds like a logical outcome to me. So, of course the Russians would want to pursue some type of research and development in that area -- lab if not atmospheric testing. (when funding permits).

Humbly,

Dave

March 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDave

Also, SDI survived Reykjavik, thanks to the stubborn old cowboy -- albeit in the lab, which was a limitation acceptable by both parties (acceptable despite ABM treaty '68 -- a re-interpretation of it, if you will). The Russians accepted the terms that led to the INF treaty in '87. And so they knew the Americans would continue with the research indefinitely. The Russians would also want to move forward with some limited activity in that area on systems to counter/overcome it, and within in the limits of all existing treaties signed by both parties. Bush and Co. signaled early on their intention of moving beyond that and withdrawing from the ABM treaty completely.

Humbly,

Dave

March 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDave

Dear Dave: I couldn't agree more. And every bit of intelligence, from all sectors, firmly indicates that the Russians--and the US with significant UK partnering--have been actively involved in this research from before the announcement of SDI. The importance of having satellite-to-satellite kill was an active issue from the early Seventies onward--which I presume you know as well or better than I, given the references you cite: there IS a lot of history here.
Today, there are whole treatises--and Air Force White Papers--written on the evolving issues, and they make for interesting (if dry) reading. But all of them--and Jane's and all the other Defense Watch organizations, regardless of national/partisan affiliation--have charted the inexhorable progress toward the weaponization of space. And the major players are all pretty much aware of the capabilities of the other players--which is one of the reasons I discount this incident as being an "intentional strike": no one in the know needs this "demonstration."

I really liked your comments.

Best,
Dr. Charles E. Gannon

March 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDr. Charles E. Gannon

"Dear Dave: I couldn’t agree more. And every bit of intelligence, from all sectors, firmly indicates that the Russians–and the US with significant UK partnering–have been actively involved in this research from before the announcement of SDI. The importance of having satellite-to-satellite kill was an active issue from the early Seventies onward..."

*********
Dear Dr. Gannon,

Absolutely, and other delivery vehicles as well. The Space Shuttle was originally designed with anti-satellite capability, and the Soviets were aware of it. The Soviets experimented with ground-based lasers in the Seventies (particle-beam technology), targeting satellites from Earth. The Russians actually tested one of these lasers on the Challenger shuttle (if I recall the shuttle name correctly). The shuttle's systems stopped functioning for several minutes and it made the crew sick. I believe it was 1983. I was young at the time, but you might remember. The Soviets also believed that the shuttle was designed to jam the small ABM system deployed in Moscow (small system allowed under '72 ABM treaty), as well as other strategic missile and laser systems from space. The treaty had always been designed to provide some room to wiggle.

Bush Senior pushed for a baby SDI. Introduced under Clinton, Theater Missile Defense (TMD) was another SDI offspring.

Error in my previous post -- 1972 ABM Treaty, not 1968.

Dave

March 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDave

And the only difference in the case of SDI as opposed to all the previous projects is that it was political. That was the whole point of it. That was its purpose. Reagan's utopian dreams and whether or not it could actually work was irrelevant. That was never the issue. SDI wasn't any more significant, as you correctly pointed out in your previous posts. You're right - it wasn't that different from earlier Seventies concepts. Hyper politicization of SDI simply made it an issue.

Dave

March 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDave

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>