<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran MediaWatch: Has &#8220;Green Reform&#8221; Disappeared in Washington?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enduringamerica.com/2009/11/26/iran-mediawatch-has-green-reform-disappeared-in-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enduringamerica.com/2009/11/26/iran-mediawatch-has-green-reform-disappeared-in-washington/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Harrop</title>
		<link>http://enduringamerica.com/2009/11/26/iran-mediawatch-has-green-reform-disappeared-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-15126</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Harrop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enduringamerica.com/?p=22143#comment-15126</guid>
		<description>Concur with the take-down of the WaPo &amp; NYT&#039;s items, particularly the bit of Mr. Ross (!) going to China to get China (that paragon of human rights standards) on board with a &quot;get-tough on the road to unleashing Israel approach to Iran.&quot;  If the planted story is to be believed, we have Ross in China warning that if Iran isn&#039;t stopped, then, then, then.... (breath pause), then Japan will go the final half yard and weaponize its nuclear program.  Hysterical yes.  And reported with a straight face in the WaPo.

With such contorted strategems afoot, can only imagine how difficult John Limbert&#039;s new role is.

Saw the Bahari piece yesterday in the Toronto G&amp;M....  an especially important item, though indeed, it can be read as quite &quot;muddled.&quot;  On the one hand, he seems to buy the KS type argument that we must &quot;side with history&quot; so as to not repeat errors of past, even as at the same time he realizes there&#039;s much serious &quot;gray afoot&quot; -- that engagement must go on...  It&#039;s in the interests not just of this or that faction, but in the interests of all, and of both countries.  That we have much we don&#039;t like in each other&#039;s systems,....  well, is that new?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concur with the take-down of the WaPo &amp; NYT&#8217;s items, particularly the bit of Mr. Ross (!) going to China to get China (that paragon of human rights standards) on board with a &#8220;get-tough on the road to unleashing Israel approach to Iran.&#8221;  If the planted story is to be believed, we have Ross in China warning that if Iran isn&#8217;t stopped, then, then, then&#8230;. (breath pause), then Japan will go the final half yard and weaponize its nuclear program.  Hysterical yes.  And reported with a straight face in the WaPo.</p>
<p>With such contorted strategems afoot, can only imagine how difficult John Limbert&#8217;s new role is.</p>
<p>Saw the Bahari piece yesterday in the Toronto G&amp;M&#8230;.  an especially important item, though indeed, it can be read as quite &#8220;muddled.&#8221;  On the one hand, he seems to buy the KS type argument that we must &#8220;side with history&#8221; so as to not repeat errors of past, even as at the same time he realizes there&#8217;s much serious &#8220;gray afoot&#8221; &#8212; that engagement must go on&#8230;  It&#8217;s in the interests not just of this or that faction, but in the interests of all, and of both countries.  That we have much we don&#8217;t like in each other&#8217;s systems,&#8230;.  well, is that new?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmd</title>
		<link>http://enduringamerica.com/2009/11/26/iran-mediawatch-has-green-reform-disappeared-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-15042</link>
		<dc:creator>rmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enduringamerica.com/?p=22143#comment-15042</guid>
		<description>In the &lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt; story:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama referred to the issue with Iran as &quot;a core national interest&quot; of the United States, a conscious use of a term China employs on sensitive issues such as Taiwan and Tibet. &quot;It&#039;s their terminology coming back at them, emphasizing how critical&quot; the issue is to the United States, the U.S. official said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Interesting that the official would think it clever to use, about a foreign country, a term that China uses about its own provinces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <i>Washington Post</i> story:</p>
<blockquote><p>Obama referred to the issue with Iran as &#8220;a core national interest&#8221; of the United States, a conscious use of a term China employs on sensitive issues such as Taiwan and Tibet. &#8220;It&#8217;s their terminology coming back at them, emphasizing how critical&#8221; the issue is to the United States, the U.S. official said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting that the official would think it clever to use, about a foreign country, a term that China uses about its own provinces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
