Saturday
Jun262010
Iran Document & Analysis: US Gov't Statement on Sanctions, Nukes, & Human Rights
Saturday, June 26, 2010 at 9:07
I am not sure, in all the fuss around this week's US Congress vote for stricter sanctions on Tehran, that this statement by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton received much attention.
The first two paragraphs are the expected language on containing Iran's nuclear programme, but the third paragraph shifts the discussion to Tehran's approach to the rights of its citizens. We noted two weeks ago, on the anniversary of Iran's Presidential elections that the Obama and Clinton declarations were the most forthright to date on rights, with the Secretary of State calling for the release of all political prisoners (and naming some of them). Yesterday's declaration continues that trend.
But what does it mean in practice, as opposed to rhetoric?
STATEMENT BY SECRETARY CLINTON
Passage of Iran Sanctions Legislation
I join President Obama in welcoming Congressional passage of legislation to strengthen sanctions against Iran. We support the broad aims of HR 2194, the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 — constraining Iran’s nuclear program, changing the calculus of Iran’s leaders, and demonstrating that Iran’s policies decrease its standing, and further isolate it in the international community. We are committed to fully implementing this legislation in a manner that advances our multilateral dual-track strategy of engagement and pressure.
These new measures, along with action by the European Union and Australia, build on United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929 and underscore the resolve of the international community to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and to hold it accountable for its international obligations. The United States will work with our partners to maximize the impact of these efforts and to continue pursuing a diplomatic resolution to the international community’s concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
In addition to increasing pressure on Iran’s illicit nuclear activities, this legislation also addressed the Iranian government’s continued violation of the fundamental rights of its citizens. A year after the Iranian people took to the streets to protest an election, the leadership continues to violate its most fundamental duties of government, denying its people the right to speak freely, to assemble without fear, and to the equal administration of justice. We support the Congress’ efforts to call attention to these violations, and the United States will continue to hold Iran accountable for its obligations to respect the rights of its own people.
The first two paragraphs are the expected language on containing Iran's nuclear programme, but the third paragraph shifts the discussion to Tehran's approach to the rights of its citizens. We noted two weeks ago, on the anniversary of Iran's Presidential elections that the Obama and Clinton declarations were the most forthright to date on rights, with the Secretary of State calling for the release of all political prisoners (and naming some of them). Yesterday's declaration continues that trend.
But what does it mean in practice, as opposed to rhetoric?
The Latest from Iran (26 June): Absolute Security?
STATEMENT BY SECRETARY CLINTON
Passage of Iran Sanctions Legislation
I join President Obama in welcoming Congressional passage of legislation to strengthen sanctions against Iran. We support the broad aims of HR 2194, the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 — constraining Iran’s nuclear program, changing the calculus of Iran’s leaders, and demonstrating that Iran’s policies decrease its standing, and further isolate it in the international community. We are committed to fully implementing this legislation in a manner that advances our multilateral dual-track strategy of engagement and pressure.
These new measures, along with action by the European Union and Australia, build on United Nations Security Council Resolution 1929 and underscore the resolve of the international community to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and to hold it accountable for its international obligations. The United States will work with our partners to maximize the impact of these efforts and to continue pursuing a diplomatic resolution to the international community’s concerns regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
In addition to increasing pressure on Iran’s illicit nuclear activities, this legislation also addressed the Iranian government’s continued violation of the fundamental rights of its citizens. A year after the Iranian people took to the streets to protest an election, the leadership continues to violate its most fundamental duties of government, denying its people the right to speak freely, to assemble without fear, and to the equal administration of justice. We support the Congress’ efforts to call attention to these violations, and the United States will continue to hold Iran accountable for its obligations to respect the rights of its own people.
Reader Comments (4)
[...] Clintons Statement zu Sanktionen, Atomprogramm und Menschenrechten in Iran [...]
Clinton says "In addition to increasing pressure on Iran’s illicit nuclear activities, this legislation also addressed the Iranian government’s continued violation of the fundamental rights of its citizens."
How? And this isn't yet another ironic post from me :-) - I would like to know which sanctions in the new law "addressed the Iranian government’s continued violation of the fundamental rights of its citizens."
Scroll down to the bottom points: Outline of Iran Sanctions Legislation & points on how it addresses #humanrights http://bit.ly/cu2BMA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cu2BMA
Thanks Mwolda,
And here they are for everyone to check out (I wonder if Obama's hit list will eventually be leaked?):
• The legislation also requires the president to compile a public list of individuals in Iran who are complicit in human rights violations — and would ban them from receiving U.S. visas and would freeze their financial assets held in U.S. banks.
• Any company that provides Iran with technology or equipment that would restrict free speech could not receive U.S. government contracts.
• Finally, the legislation imposes export controls to stop the illegal export of sensitive technology to Iran through other countries and would allow the president to impose severe export restrictions to countries that will not cooperate.