Iran: Ashura's Message "Iranians Are Not Punching Bags" (Josh Shahryar)

Josh Shahryar offers this assessment of Sunday's events, also posted on his blog:

The Ashura (December 27) protests across Iran are over. Tens of thousands marched across the country as in the past to show their discontent with dictatorship and human rights violations. They yet again proved that the Iranian struggle is far from over. But after following the protests for almost 200 days, I don’t think that it was just another show of force. This was a tipping point in their struggle for one of the most basic of human rights –-- the freedom to speak one’s mind without fear of repression.

Since June, the people of Iran have come out to streets peacefully and have tried to make their voices heard. And what was the government’s response? Bullets, batons, cables… arrests, injuries, deaths… torture, rape, murder. Few people have been so fearless and devout with their resolve to overturn the tide of tyranny as the people of Iran. Their humanity has been written about and well-deservedly praised. However, let us not have unreasonable expectations from them. They are human after all. And like all humans, they are susceptible to frustration and eventually – anger.

The Latest from Iran (28 December): Taking Stock
Iran: A Point of No Return?
Iran: A 5-Minute, 5-Point Reaction to The Events of Ashura
Latest Iran Video: The Ashura Protests (27 December — 3rd Set)
Latest Iran Video: The Ashura Protests (27 December — 2nd Set)
Latest Iran Video: The Ashura Protests (27 December)
The Latest from Iran (27 December): The Day of Ashura

For the first time in 200 days, the Iranian people decided that enough was enough.

If the government was going to send goons, then they were going to deal with them the way goons are dealt with. We had seen burning homes, bleeding protesters and protesters being dragged across streets. This time around, we saw burning police cars, bleeding Basijis and riot police being dragged and beaten.

As a human rights activist and an admirer of Mahatma Gandhi, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela, I am strictly opposed to violence. What went on in Iran yesterday was anything but peaceful. Protesters fought back and they fought back hard. The level of violence against protesters may have been high, but it was answered. The response may not have been as violent as the assault of the security forces, but it was clearly expressed.

This prompted many of my friends and colleagues to question their support for the Green Movement. After all, we were expecting a non-violent revolution, one spurred by peaceful protests. But let us not forget. There is a difference between unprovoked acts of violence against individuals and self-defense. Did we really expect the Iranian people to just sit back and allow the government to kill, maim and arrest people ad infinitum? What would I or you do if someone used violence against us for six months over and over and over again? Are we going to go out and present ourselves as living targets for shooting practice? Or are we going to hang “Hit Me!” signs on our backs to make it easier for our attackers?

I won’t. The problem is that peaceful protests are great. However, they only really work when the opposing side is human enough to not use violence on such a massive scale. The protests in Iran in my opinion have been far from peaceful. It takes two hands to clap. How can we expect the government to repress people and at the same time not expect the people to fight back? This is what happens with bullies at schools. They only attack those who they think won’t fight back.

Next time the Basij, riot police, IRGC and plainclothesmen are out in Tehran during protests, they’ll know that their actions are going to be met with counter-measures. They’ll know that Iranians aren’t just sacks of wheat that they can pound on endlessly and mercilessly. If they fall into protesters’ hands, they should expect the worst.

Ashura’s protests in my opinion started a new phase in the revolution in Iran. The people are no longer going to sit back and watch as the government continues to not listen to their demands. They will come out and if they are attacked, there will be a crushing answer. The security forces can no longer use violence against protesters and then go back home to their children, enjoy a good meal, and make love to their women. They can no longer do that while bleeding protesters lay dying in hospitals, which will promptly transfer them to prisons where they will be locked in tiny holes for months on end.

The goons should know that in the future when they are out during a protest in Tehran, that if they attacked protesters, they will go home covered in their own blood and know how it feels. Because if they had felt it before, we wouldn’t have had to hear about Sohrab A’rabi’s body locked away in a morgue for weeks or see Neda Agha-Soltan’s dying eyes. I believe the Green Movement is still fully committed to non-violence, but yesterday they illustrated that their commitment extends to self-defense as well.

Comments

[Megan]

Escot,

I appreciate your perspective and your thoughtful comments. Non-violent protest in theory sounds grand. In practice, however, it fails when there is no functional constitution or when there is utter disregard for it. Instead of debating non-violent verses violent, I ask you to please listen to this audio file from today (December 29). In this audio file an eye witness shares her experience of December 27 in the streets of Tehran in response to an Iranian listener in Germany who had expressed his desire for continuation of peaceful protest. Her comments are at minute 23 in this audio file. Please hear her out and let us know if we have the right to advocate that she and others like her not to lash out at those who want to kill them. http://epersianradio.com/main/saeed%20ghaemmaghami/, then click on file name : 12/29/2009 1:05 PM 27158256 Ba Hamihanan 12-29-09 TUE ( Kaveh ).mp3

She and a few other protesters in Tehran call epersian radio while they are protesting and they tell us what they see. They also leave their cell phones on so we can hear the protest live. They risk their lives by going into the belly of the beast (regime security apparatus) so they can have a government that recognizes and respects their rights. They make themselves target of regime bullet, baton, knife and tear gas so they can let us bear witness to their struggle against atrocities of Iranian regime. I have listened to her reports during past protests and her eye witness accounts have been on the mark confirmed with follow up video clips and reports by credential reporters. Listening to her and other volunteer reporters from streets of Tehran as they are being beaten and gassed, I and other hold our breath when they go silent in the middle of their reports or go silent when we could hear the shots being fired in the background. We agonize for their safety until they call back again.

If you are not Farsi speaking, you may want to ask other readers on this site or elsewhere to help you hear what she says. I will not do the translation because I do not want my bias potentially seep out. Again, I ask you to please listen to her comments and several listeners who call toward the end of this two-hour program on the topic of violent vs. non-violent protest.

[Scott Lucas]

Hamid

Thank you --- it is an honour to be recognised as such....

Escot