Radio Zamaneh reported last night that the Guardian Council has approved legislation for a revised Islamic Penal Code, announcing that it does not contradict the principles of Shari’a or the Constitution of the Islamic Republic constitution.
Parliament said necessary reforms had been made; however, analysts claim that the code is still unchanged on matters such as stoning, dismemberment and execution of minors, and gender discrimination.
We re-post the critique of United4Iran and Arseh Sevom, originally featured on EA on 7 January:
The "Islamic Penal Bill" flouts Iran's legal obligations under the ICCPR [International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]. The legislation endangers free expression and reinforces laws that violate the rights of Iranian citizens. The bill fails to prohibit stoning, lashing, and other cruel, inhumane, and degrading punishments; redress discriminatory laws; or, raise the age of majority for girls and boys. In a particularly worrisome clause, the bill expands punishment for "actions against national security", a charge that has routinely been used to persecute dissidents.
A review of the bill (pdf in Persianhub ) by Forum for Justice raises serious concerns about the following:
"The judge is duty bound to make all efforts to find the proper sentence in the codified laws. If he fails to do so he should issue the sentence in accordance with the valid Islamic sources or valid fatwas [ed: precedents based on interpretations of the law by recognized religious figures]. The judge cannot use the absence or insufficiency or brevity or conflict of the codified laws as an excuse to refuse to issue a verdict. "