I will be honest. I saw this article by Brian Murphy of the Associated Press earlier in the week but decided not to post it or even refer to it. I did so because I could not find the basis for his claims about the Green movement. Neither the quotes from his “some experts” do not or his knowledge of the situation (he claims, for example, that only “several thousand” demonstrators turned out in Iran on 13 Aban) support his sweeping conclusion of a “potential unravelling” of the opposition. They do not back his speculation that “Mousavi and Karroubi’s reluctance could leave room for more militant opposition leaders to emerge in the future” — indeed, Murphy’s implication is that the mainstream of the Green protest desire revolution while Mousavi and Karroubi “have repeatedly said they do not seek to overthrow the ruling clerics”.
On second thought, however, the far better-informed and thoughtful discussion amongst EA readers has considered the direction of the Green Wave after the latest protests and statements and actions by its leaders. So I’m posting Murphy’s piece as his personal contribution to the debate and looking forward to the ideas and critiques of our own “experts” on the Comment board.
Iran’s opposition steers challenge toward the top
Brian Murphy
Just minutes before anti-riot police charged opposition marchers in Tehran last week, a new chant bubbled up from the crowd: “Death to Nobody.”
It was more than just a play on the “Death to America” slogans that are staples of Iran’s political life. The cries give a sense of how much the protest movement has evolved since the raw outrage of last summer.
The demonstrations have moved beyond narrow attacks on President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his disputed re-election in June. They are now drifting toward a blanket challenge of the Islamic leadership’s right to rule. Read the rest of this entry »
Yesterday (Oct 10, 2009) Mir Hossein Mousavi visited Mehdi Karroubi in his home to talk about the post-election events. In this meeting both presidential candidates by pointing out the efforts of the IRIB (the state-run TV and radio channels) to diminish the reform movement, emphasised on their legal rights and demanded to appear on TV/radio to defend themselves and reply to the false accusations made against them on the “national” stage.
UPDATE 1800 GMT: A reader usefully interjects, “I would like to just remind you that “The Unity Plan’ is not from Rafsanjani and it is from ‘Pro-Government people seeking truce.’”
It’s a fair point, but the reason that this Plan was linked to Rafsanjani was because of widespread chatter, some of it fuelled by Rafsanjani allies, that the former President was the driving force behind the initiative for political reconciliation. Mehdi Karroubi’s letter, published in a separate entry, also works from that assumption.
The overriding point is that we don’t know Rafsanjani’s role in this plan.
UPDATE 1650 GMT: My apologies for a slip-up in the previous entry. There are only eight names listed for the 9-member committee. That is because the 9th spot is for a representative of “political opposition (Mousavi)”
UPDATE 0650 GMT: The names of the proposed nine members of the top Committee in the “draft” of the Plan: Ayatollah Mahdavi Kani (“hard-line” cleric), Ayatollah Hashemi Shahroudi (former head of Judiciary), Ali Akbar Velayati (former Foreign Minister), Aboutorabi Fard (Deputy Parliament Speaker), Mahmoud Doai (Head of Etalaat News and former Ambassador to Iraq), Hassan Rohani (Rafsanjani stalwart), Masih Mohajeri (editor of Jomhuri Eslami newspaper), Habibollah Asgharowladi (leader of the Motalefeh Party).
It is claimed that the “draft” was written by Habibollah Asgaroladi, M.Mirsalim, M.Bahonar (Deputy Parliament Speaker), M.Nabavi, H.Mozafar, Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel (former Parliament Speaker).
UPDATE 30 September 0640 GMT: No further political developments but events at Fars News indicate that this was an early draft of a plan which the paper, either through poor journalism or an attempt to cause mischief, initially presented as a final, agreed proposal. After posting and then withdrawing several stories overnight, Fars eventually put up a version which explicitly refers to the Plan — similar in its provisions to what we set out below — as a “draft”.
URGENT UPDATE 2015 GMT: There have been curious twists in the story. Fars had now modified its story of the document, saying that it is a “draft” from the Expediency Council. There is no date, no stamp, and no signature. (Note: within the last 30 minutes, the modified Fars story has been pulled from the website.) Read the rest of this entry »
UPDATED 31 August, 0725 GMT: Enduring America’s Chris Emery, formerly known as “Mr Jones”, has now made his contribution to what is becoming, I think, one of the most important discussions in the post-election crisis — see below. Mr Smith has offered a reply.
UPDATED 1145 GMT: Mr Smith has made another intervention in the debate.
–
Over the weekend, after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s tough talking at Friday prayers in Tehran and as he was submitting his Cabinet choices to Parliament, we have been debating the President’s position and future prospects. EA’s Mr Smith and Mr Johnson are joined by Muhammad Sahimi of Tehran Bureau, whose column sparked the discussion, and Fintan Dunne.
SAHIMI: ….Such fabrications [like those in his Friday speech] are of course meant to present Ahmadinejad as a confident leader. But, in reality, he is weaker and more isolated than ever. True, the right wing is in control, but that control has been achieved first and foremost by the support of the high command of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). Otherwise, the base of support for Ahmadinejad among the population is extremely narrow, limited to at most 15% of the population. Read the rest of this entry »
1700 GMT: More, Much More on that Assembly of Experts Meeting. The Executive Committee’s agenda appears to have been a delay in the next meeting of the Assembly, which was due to take place within the next 10-12 days, for a month because of Ramadan.
This rules out any quick intervention by the Assembly in the political crisis.
But the big question: who asked for the delay? Was it the head of the Committee, Hashemi Rafsanjani, to give himself time for his next moves? Or was it the other members — former head of judiciary Hashemi Shahroudi, Mohammad Yazdi, Prosecutor General Ghorban Ali Dorri Najafabadi, and Ahmad Khatami — all of whom are more supportive of President Ahmadinejad?
2105 GMT: Jomhoori Eslami has published a statement from 120 physicians and faculty members. After condemning the harsh and savage treatment of protesters, they assert, “It is imperative that, when the credentials of individuals aspiring to high office is being reviewed, their mental health should also be reviewed by a knowledgeable committee that the people can trust”.
2100 GMT: Amir Mohsen Mohammadi, student and human rights activist, has been released from detention on $150,000 bail. Mohammadi had been detained since 14 June.
1945 GMT: Our Top Tribute to Journalism. Earlier today (0930 GMT) we awarded the Gold Medal for Dumbest Western Image for #IranElection to Time magazine’s “Will Iran’s ‘Kennedys’ Challenge Ahmadinejad?”
Who, you may ask, was the previous winner? Reza Sayah of CNN for his profile of Zahra Rahnavard, Mir Hossein Mousavi’s wife, “a woman some [i.e., Reza Sayah of CNN] are calling Iran’s Michelle Obama”.
The second story is potentially bigger. Press TV’s website reports that former President Mohammad Khatami met former members of Parliament and said, “We are the real protectors of the Islamic Republic not those who showed in recent months that they are uprooting the republic and Islamic nature of the establishment.” Khatami expressed concern about the “illegal” attitude adopted towards the Iranian nation after the election: “Certain ongoing moves run counter to legal principles.”
What Press TV fails to note is that those former members of Parliament issued a statement a few days ago raising the issue of the authority of the Supreme Leader. So this meeting may be part of the move to invoke Law 111 over the prudence and justice of Khamenei.
2005 GMT: Agence France Presse reports, “Iran released 24-year-old French academic Clotilde Reiss on bail Sunday six weeks after she was arrested on suspicion of spying, the French presidency said, adding that she is in good health.”
2000 GMT: Revolutionary Road has posted a summary in English, including the names of the defendants, in today’s third trial of post-election political detainees.
1905 GMT: And it’s not just Press TV that is giving airtime to the opposition and “enemies” of the regime. An EA correspondent reports that Iranian state television, including IRIB Channel 1, is also carrying the denial of charges by an attorney for one of the defendants in today’s trial in Tehran (see 1625 GMT).
1855 GMT: Press TV’s website is now summarising, in fact almost reprinting in full, the latest statement from Mir Hossein Mousavi: “Our election campaign was conducted under the Constitution and the principles which the Iranian nation holds dear. We still remain committed to the same slogans.”
The article prints, without any critical commentary, Mousavi’s memories of Election Night:
[At first] we thought that mismanagement was the cause of chaos. I, myself, made contacts with authorities of the country. On the election day, I called the Judiciary Chief [Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi] twice, the Prosecutor General [Qorban-Ali Dorri-Najafabadi] two times, the Majlis Speaker [Ali Larijani] twice, and the Office of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution [Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei] four times to raise issues about the pre-planned scenarios.
Mousavi, the former prime minister who worked under the founder of the Islamic Revolution, added that he had dispatched a team to see Interior Minister Sadeq Mahsouli, “but, surprisingly, he refused to meet” with them.
Mousavi’s challenge to the regime is also featured: “We are confident that an atmosphere of mistrust would not have been created in the country if a fair attitude had been adopted [after the election], to the demands of the Iranian people, and if the media had been prevented from attributing the nation’s will to foreigners and diverting facts.”
In the midst of the ongoing uncertainty over the appointment of Mohammad Sadegh Larijani as head of Iran’s judiciary Enduring America correspondents have been paying close attention to this extended analysis by Mehdi Khalaji, of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Khalaji offers both background and critique of Larijani within the context of what he calls the “militarization” of Iran’s legal and judicial bodies.
We have read this in the light both of WINEP’s political position of long-time hostility to the Iranian regime and of Khalaji’s own history as a former cleric. An EA correspondent writes, “Khalaji usually goes down very strong on his former Qom classmates usually. His analysis may turn out to be true, but Sadegh is actually more scholarly than what Khalaji makes him out to be. For example, I have a very erudite rebuttal of Mohammad Khatami’s civil society that was written by him 11 years ago in a right-wing weekly called Sobh. However, what Khalaji says about Khamenei’s progressive replacement of the elite with a younger generation of his own liking is very similar to other analyses, including those from “reformists”. Interesting to see how opinions are converging on this front.”
Militarization of the Iranian Judiciary
Widespread reports suggest that Sadeq Larijani, a young and inexperienced cleric with close ties to Iran’s military and intelligence agencies, will officially replace Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi as head of the Iranian
judiciary on August 16. [Editor's Note: The installation was originally scheduled for 15 August but has been delayed, reported to the 17th.] This appointment is particularly significant, since the judiciary in Iran wields considerable power — albeit through the approval of Iran’s top leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei — and has a great deal of latitude to make decisions without reference to law or Islamic concepts, especially when “safeguarding the interests of the regime” is deemed necessary. Read the rest of this entry »
I will be honest. I saw this article by Brian Murphy of the Associated Press earlier in the week but decided not to post it or even refer to it. I did so because I could not find the basis for his claims about the Green movement. Neither the quotes from his “some experts” do not or his knowledge of the situation (he claims, for example, that only “several thousand” demonstrators turned out in Iran on 13 Aban) support his sweeping conclusion of a “potential unravelling” of the opposition. They do not back his speculation that “Mousavi and Karroubi’s reluctance could leave room for more militant opposition leaders to emerge in the future” — indeed, Murphy’s implication is that the mainstream of the Green protest desire revolution while Mousavi and Karroubi “have repeatedly said they do not seek to overthrow the ruling clerics”.
UPDATE 1800 GMT: A reader usefully interjects, “I would like to just remind you that “The Unity Plan’ is not from Rafsanjani and it is from ‘Pro-Government people seeking truce.’”
UPDATED 31 August, 0725 GMT: Enduring America’s Chris Emery, formerly known as “Mr Jones”, has now made his contribution to what is becoming, I think, one of the most important discussions in the post-election crisis — see below. Mr Smith has offered a reply.
In the midst of the ongoing uncertainty over the appointment of Mohammad Sadegh Larijani as head of Iran’s judiciary Enduring America correspondents have been paying close attention to 
Entries (RSS)