2030 GMT: El Baradei’s Clues. Want to know the state of the nuclear talks with Iran? The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohammad El Baradei, offers all the necessary hints in an interview with Reuters.
1. Iran’s “swap” proposal, exchanging 20% enriched uranium for Iranian 3.5% stock inside the country, is not acceptable. “They are ready to put material under IAEA control on an (Iranian) island in the Persian Gulf. But the whole idea as I explained to them, to defuse this crisis, is to take the material out of Iran. I do not think (Iran’s counter-proposal) will work as far as the West is concerned.”
To back his line, El Baradei is playing up uncertainty over the state of Iran’s nuclear plans, pivoting on the controversy over the second enrichment plant at Fordoo: “You cannot really use it for civilian purposes. It’s too small to produce fuel for a civilian reactor.” So while the IAEA has “no indication that there are other undeclared facilities in Iran” or “any information that such facilities exist”, Fordoo’s existence raises questions about a wider Iranian programme — questions that El Baradei can use (or create) to push back the “swap” initiative.
Iranian state media has already reacted: “IAEA fails to address Iran nuclear swap concerns”. But this pretty much puts an end to Tehran’s offer: if El Baradei won’t back it, then it’s almost certain none of the “5+1″ powers will be offering any support.
2. But the talks are still very much alive, resting on a “third-party enrichment” arrangement. The plan would be one in which the IAEA would “take custody and control of the material. We’ve offered also to have the material in Turkey, a country which has the trust of all the parties…. I am open (to Iranian amendments) if they have any additional guarantees that do not involve keeping the material in Iran.”
3. So, for now, El Baradei does not see a move to aggressive sanctions: UN resolutions are mainly “expressions of frustration”.
Summary? Ball’s in your court, President Ahmadinejad (and Supreme Leader Khamenei). Don’t knock it back — take a modified “third-party enrichment” offer and everyone will be happy. Read the rest of this entry »
It took less than a day after Pyongyang’s second nuclear test on 25 May for Israel to identify the real significance: Iran.
Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman stated that the international community had to do everything to prevent Iran and North Korea from acquiring nuclear weapons. He told Army Radio: “To our regret we see a mad arms race…..Everything must be done in order thwart their attempts to reach a nuclear capability.” Lieberman added:
Up until today there were neither sanctions against Iran nor against North Korea. They need to be completely closed in terms of financial activities; the two states need to understand they are dependent on the supply of petrol because they have no refineries.
This, however, was far from Israel’s most ambitious attempt to put Iran at the centre of a global anti-Israel nuclear conspiracy. For that, we have to go to Latin America.
Whatever else is said about Barack Obama, you cannot accuse him of being slow off the mark. A day after the Inauguration, he issued the order closing the Guantanamo Bay detention camp and CIA “black sites” and ending torture by American agencies. Two days later, he revoked the Reagan directive banning funding for any organisation carrying out abortions overseas. On 26 January, he ordered a new approach to emissions and global warming, as the State Department appointed Todd Stern to oversee policy on climate change.
5 p.m. We’re off for some downtime. Back in the morning with overnight updates, including the latest of Obama envoy George Mitchell’s first trip to the Middle East.
3:30 p.m. Barack, We Have a Problem. Our news this morning (2:45 a.m. and 6 a.m.) was on the emerging “third country” solution for Guantanamo ex-detainees. The meeting of the 27 European Union foreign ministers, however, has failed to agree a unified approach. The French-led proposal to take up to 60 detainees has been blocked or undermined by Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands.
The cheekiest excuse of all came from British Foreign Minister David Miliban who said that, as Britain had taken back nine of its citizens and three of its permanent residents, it had already made its “significant contribution”.
2030 GMT: El Baradei’s Clues. Want to know the state of the nuclear talks with Iran? The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohammad El Baradei, offers all the necessary hints in an interview with Reuters.
Entries (RSS)