On the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, external yet powerful actors continued giving statements on Tuesday. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was welcomed by Egyptian officials and U.S. Mideast special envoy George Mitchell in Cairo on late Tuesday. On the same day, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband held talks with Jordan’s King Abdullah II.
Milliband criticized the construction of settlements in the West Bank and stated that these “illegal” settlements represent an “obstacle” on the path of peace. On the two-state solution, which requires East Jerusalem as the Palestinians’ capital, Milliband said:
The current situation is obviously particularly tense in respect to Jerusalem. We view events there with considerable concern, along with our EU and international partners.
Any alternative to a two-state vision as a solution for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict would be dark and unwelcome.
King Abdullah called on the international community to pressure Israel to stop its “unilateral actions” in East Jerusalem. However, the tone of Egyptian Foreign Ministry’s statement went further, calling on the international community to protect Jerusalem from the “racist steps” being taken by Israel to change the demographics of the city. Indeed, it was reported by Haaretz that a Foreign Ministry spokesman appealed to the United Nations Security Council with the complaint that Israel has been trying to change the demographic in all Palestinian territory.
Despite US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s “positive statements” after her meetings with Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday, criticisms from the Arab side escalated on Sunday.
We have finally tracked down a copy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s major foreign policy speech at the Begin-Sadat Center today. We’ll have a full analysis tomorrow, but our immediate impression is of Netanyahu trying to take the pressure off his Government by putting the ball in the court of the Palestinians and, beyond them, the US. He is trying to hold to his preferred agenda of discussing economic development and security measures rather than statehood but also having to bend a bit to the American insistence on a two-state resolution.
Or, put in other words, Netanyahu is finally saying, yes, you can have your State of Palestine, but here are the conditions. Israel will have to be recognised from the outset. There will be no “right of return” for Palestinians displaced from their lands in 1948. And there must be a”demilitarized” state with no security beyond internal police: otherwise Israel will face another “Hamastan”.
NETANYAHU: Honored guests, citizens of Israel.
Peace has always been our people’s most ardent desire. Our prophets gave the world the vision of peace, we greet one another with wishes of peace, and our prayers conclude with the word peace. Read the rest of this entry »
Thursday’s meeting between Palestinian Authority leader, Mahmoud Abbas, and President Obama focused on the conditions for a peace process with the goal of a two-state solution. Abbas restated his dedication to the obligations deriving from the principles of the US-UK-EU-Russia Quartet, along with his willingness to negotiate the permanent status issues of Jerusalem, refugees, borders, water, security and the release of all Palestinian prisoners, while President Obama underlined the significance of a freeze on Israeli settlements by warning Tel Aviv:
I have not put forward a specific timetable. But let me just point out, when I was campaigning for this office I said that one of the mistakes I would not make is to wait until the end of my first term, or the end of my second term, before we moved on this issue aggressively. And we’ve been true to that commitment.
The full transcript of the Abbas-Obama press conference follows the video:
OBAMA: Hello, everybody. Well, it is a great pleasure to welcome President Abbas to the Oval Office. We had — we just completed an extensive conversation, both privately as well as with our delegations, about how we can advance peace in the Middle East and how we can reaffirm some core principles that I think can result in Palestinians and Israelis living side by side in peace and security.
1:35 p.m. After a long and busy week, we’re taking the night off. We’ll be back in the morning with all the overnight developments fit to notice.
12:50 p.m. According to the German magazine Der Spiegel, France has drafted a plan for European countries to take 60 detainees from the Guantanamo Bay facility. The French Government has refused to comment on the report.
A US military spokesman claimed the incident occurred in a joint operation with Iraqi forces, but an Iraqi police general said no Iraqi troops were present.
11:15 a.m. India Snubs Barack and Hillary. Here’s one we missed. All week we were identifying Richard Holbrooke as President Obama’s special envoy for Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India. In fact, when the appointment was announced on Thursday, India had fallen off the title.
It wasn’t an omission. According to a US official, “When the Indian government learned Holbrooke was going to do [Pakistan]-India, they swung into action and lobbied to have India excluded from his purview. And they succeeded. Holbrooke’s account officially does not include India.”
Daniel Markey of the Council on Foreign Relations offers an explanation for Delhi’s resistance: “They [India] are the big fish [in the region]. They don’t want to be grouped with the ‘problem children’ in the region, on Kashmir, on nuclear issues.” Moreover, another US official added, “The Indians do not like Holbrooke because he has been very good on Pakistan… and has a very good feel for the place.”
1 a.m. Last night we closed with: “At the very least, I’m grateful that there has been a cessation of violence in Gaza. My concern is that we’re at the start of a different phase which will not bring resolution but further hardship.”
More of the same tonight. Today has been for mourning rather than dying — only one death from violence to my knowledge, while close to 100 bodies have been pulled from the rubble. There appears to be a very gradual Israeli pullback from the edges of the cities as they re-trench in their military occupation.
The politics today was posturing, as a lot of leaders tried to figure out how to respond to Israel’s unilateral “cease-fire”. The Europeans appear to be paralysed, as they await a President Obama, while Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak is scrambling to save his personal position. The Saudis have gone into hiding.
That means that the diplomatic baton — perhaps unexpectedly, if you scripted this a month ago — passes to Syria and other countries pursuing a stronger line in favour of Hamas. They will be at the Arab countries’ economic summit in Kuwait tomorrow, and it will be interesting to see how forthright they take their position to Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
The main question remains: how long will Israel hold out with its re-occupation in the hope that Hamas will crumble?
On the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, external yet powerful actors continued giving statements on Tuesday. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was welcomed by Egyptian officials and U.S. Mideast special envoy George Mitchell in Cairo on late Tuesday. On the same day, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband held talks with Jordan’s King Abdullah II.
Comments Off 
Despite US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s “positive statements” after her meetings with Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday, criticisms from the Arab side escalated on Sunday.
We have finally tracked down a copy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s major foreign policy speech at the Begin-Sadat Center today. We’ll have a full analysis tomorrow, but our immediate impression is of Netanyahu trying to take the pressure off his Government by putting the ball in the court of the Palestinians and, beyond them, the US. He is trying to hold to his preferred agenda of discussing economic development and security measures rather than statehood but also having to bend a bit to the American insistence on a two-state resolution.
Entries (RSS)