We have a snap analysis of the interview in Today’s LiveBlog. The interview of the Basiji member to which interviewer Jon Snow refers is also on Enduring America:
Jon Snow: “Mr President do you accept that this country is at a cross roads? We are one week away from the end of the year and that the deadline when you have to give a response to the nuclear offer made by the P5+1.
“The P5 group that meets with Germany from the security council of the United Nations – apparently representing the security council that has made this proposal about enrichment taking the material outside the country, bringing it back. And they say by the end of this year that is the deadline for a response.”
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: “I think part of this question must be corrected. Actually we have given the proposal for the exchange of the fuel and according to the regulations they have to provide the fuel without any conditions. Read the rest of this entry »
Mahmoud Reza Golshanpazhooh of the Tehran International Studies and Research Institute writes for Iran Review about the current state of discussions over Iran’s uranium enrichment programme: “The issue is not too complicated and under normal circumstances, the chances of finding a solution are greater than before.”
First of all, let me point out certain facts about Iran’s nuclear case:
1. Iran signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1968 and ratified it in 1970. In 1974, the country signed a bilateral agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is known as the Nuclear Safeguards Act, to allow IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities. The agreement has been registered under No. INFCIRC/214 as Information Circular 153 (INFCIRC/153). Accordingly, the Agency has conducted many inspections of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear facilities, all of which attested to the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear activities.
2. The West’s treatment of Iran nuclear case before presidency of Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made not only the Iranian elite, but also the public conclude that the end result would be losses, giving concessions with no result, submission to West’s bullying, and foregoing an inalienable and natural right. Read the rest of this entry »
2020 GMT: We’ve posted news of a campaign, “I Am Atefeh”, to express support for Atefeh Nabavi, the first woman jailed for post-election protest.
2015 GMT: Ayatollah JavAdi-Amoli announced, during today’s Friday Prayers in Qom, that this was his last sermon. Since June, Javadi-Amoli had expressed his displeasure over post-election events.
2110 GMT: The White House has put out the following statement:
The United States is deeply concerned about reports of additional charges facing Kian Tajbakhsh (see 1200 GMT), an Iranian-American scholar who has been detained in Iran without access to an independent lawyer since July 9, 2009. The charges against Mr. Tajbakhsh are baseless, and his original sentence on October 20 was an outrage. The Iranian government cannot earn the respect of the international community when it violates universal rights, and continues to imprison innocent people. We call on the Islamic Republic of Iran to release Mr. Tajbakhsh, and to respect the human rights of those within its borders.
0645 GMT: A busy Wednesday, not only in political updates but in conversations with those who have a window into what is happening in Washington and Tehran. The politics and possibilities are so complex that days will be needed to work through the analysis but:
1. The chief problem for the Green movement vis-a-vis the US is not if there is an envoy — Mohajerani, Makhmalbaf, Sazegara — but its lack of a clear policy (how would it take power? what would it do if it held power? is there even a single Movement rather than movements?). Then again, does that matter? In other words, if the Green movement focuses on changing the situation inside Iran, giving the US Government (and everyone else) a different political scene to consider, can “Obama: You’re with them or you’re with us” be treated as a slogan rather than a pressing concern? Read the rest of this entry »
2030 GMT: El Baradei’s Clues. Want to know the state of the nuclear talks with Iran? The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohammad El Baradei, offers all the necessary hints in an interview with Reuters.
1. Iran’s “swap” proposal, exchanging 20% enriched uranium for Iranian 3.5% stock inside the country, is not acceptable. “They are ready to put material under IAEA control on an (Iranian) island in the Persian Gulf. But the whole idea as I explained to them, to defuse this crisis, is to take the material out of Iran. I do not think (Iran’s counter-proposal) will work as far as the West is concerned.”
To back his line, El Baradei is playing up uncertainty over the state of Iran’s nuclear plans, pivoting on the controversy over the second enrichment plant at Fordoo: “You cannot really use it for civilian purposes. It’s too small to produce fuel for a civilian reactor.” So while the IAEA has “no indication that there are other undeclared facilities in Iran” or “any information that such facilities exist”, Fordoo’s existence raises questions about a wider Iranian programme — questions that El Baradei can use (or create) to push back the “swap” initiative.
Iranian state media has already reacted: “IAEA fails to address Iran nuclear swap concerns”. But this pretty much puts an end to Tehran’s offer: if El Baradei won’t back it, then it’s almost certain none of the “5+1″ powers will be offering any support.
2. But the talks are still very much alive, resting on a “third-party enrichment” arrangement. The plan would be one in which the IAEA would “take custody and control of the material. We’ve offered also to have the material in Turkey, a country which has the trust of all the parties…. I am open (to Iranian amendments) if they have any additional guarantees that do not involve keeping the material in Iran.”
3. So, for now, El Baradei does not see a move to aggressive sanctions: UN resolutions are mainly “expressions of frustration”.
Summary? Ball’s in your court, President Ahmadinejad (and Supreme Leader Khamenei). Don’t knock it back — take a modified “third-party enrichment” offer and everyone will be happy. Read the rest of this entry »
2225 GMT: Today’s UN Condemnation of Iran. The Third (Human Rights) Committee of the United Nations General Assembly has “expresse[d] its deep concern at serious ongoing and recurring human rights violations” in Iran. The non-binding resolution passed 74-48, with 59 abstentions.
The Committee voiced “particular concern at the response of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran following the Presidential election of 12 June 2009 and the concurrent rise in human rights violations”, including “harassment, intimidation and persecution, including by arbitrary arrest, detention or disappearance, of opposition members, journalists and other media representatives, bloggers, lawyers, clerics, human rights defenders, academics, (and) students”.
The outcome, the Committee asserted, had been “numerous deaths and injuries” Iwith “forced confessions and abuse of prisoners including … rape and torture”.
2115 GMT: The Brussels Non-Talks and Non-Sanctions. The New York Times has snippets of the statement issued by the delegations of the “5+1″ powers after their review of the nuclear talks with Iran (see 1240 GMT): Read the rest of this entry »
2055 GMT: Keeping the Students Down. The Government effort to contain student protest continues. Iran’s national student organisation Daftar-Tahkim-Vahdat reports that its political director, Abbas Hakimzadeh, has been arrested.
Kohzad Esmaili, head of the Gilan branch of the alumni organisation Advar-Tahkim-Vahdat (Office of Strengthening Unity), has been re-arrested after being freed on $20,000 bail.
2045 GMT: A Non-Crowd Story? While those pre-occupied with the nuclear issue try to read Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Tabriz speech for signals (see 1425 GMT), the Green movement has other concerns, namely those who did or did not turn out:
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad received a very cold welcome from the citizens. Yoldash, the Green news organisation in Tabriz, reported that, despite the fact that the chief of “popular welcoming staff” of Ahmadinejad assured 100,000 people would be present at his speech today, only about 10-15,000 people participated in this event which can be easily recognized in the pictures taken by pro-coup Mehr news agency.
An EA source says that the Government tried to ensure a large turnout by giving university students, school children, and workers time off and transport to the rally. However, possibly because of the rain, possibly for other reasons, seats remained empty.
1805 GMT: Is Rafsanjani Lining Up with the Government’s Nuclear Proposal? Former President Hashemi Rafsanjani has told the Swedish Ambassador to Iran that the International Atomic Energy Agency is legally obliged to provide 20 percent nuclear fuel to Tehran.
Sweden currently holds the European Union’s rotating presidency.
Mahmoud Reza Golshanpazhooh of the Tehran International Studies and Research Institute
2020 GMT: We’ve 
2110 GMT: The White House has put out the following statement: 
0645 GMT: A busy Wednesday, not only in political updates but in conversations with those who have a window into what is happening in Washington and Tehran. The politics and possibilities are so complex that days will be needed to work through the analysis but:
2030 GMT: El Baradei’s Clues. Want to know the state of the nuclear talks with Iran? The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohammad El Baradei, offers all the necessary hints 
2225 GMT: Today’s 
2055 GMT: Keeping the Students Down. The Government effort to contain student protest continues. Iran’s national student organisation Daftar-Tahkim-Vahdat reports that its political director, Abbas Hakimzadeh, 
Entries (RSS)