2300 GMT: Urgent Correction on the Labour Front. Earlier today (1600 GMT) Tehran Bureau reported that the Tehran Bus Workers had called for civil disobedience over the case of jailed activist Mansur Osanloo. Tonight Iran Labour Report has issued an effective retraction of the story:
On February 12, a statement appeared on various Iranian websites, including Balatarin which is one of the largest Persian-speaking community websites in the world, in the form of a poster. The poster called for solidarity with the imprisoned leader of Tehran’s bus drivers union, Mansoor Osanloo, through acts of civil disobedience beginning on March 4 around Tehran’s Valiasr square. The statement purported to be an offcial statement of the union (formally known as the Syndicate of Vahed Company Workers of Tehran and Environs). Subsequently, in an article for the popular web journal Tehran Bureau, a staff member at Iran Labor Report wrote an analysis of the union statement as it had appeared on the various websites.
It now appears that the poster-statement was not authentic and that the union’s leadership had not issued the statement. Moreover, the provenance of the statement is still not clear. The union had apparently not published an official disclaimer earlier on due to the recent disuptions with internet use in Iran. Subsequent to this, the union requested that the inauthenticity of the statement be made public and that henceforth no reference would be made of it.
2145 GMT: Labour Rights. The joint statement of three Iranian unions — the Syndicate of Tehran Bus Workers, the Syndicate of Haft Tapeh Sugar Cane Company, and The Free Union of Workers in Iran — to the United Nations Human Rights Council has been posted:
[Workers'] most urgent and most basic demands at the present time are:
URGENT UPDATE 1240 GMT: The Next Move in the Plot? Abdolhossein Ruholamini has given another interview about the crimes in Kahrizak Prison, including the abuse and death of his son Mohsen.
Ruholamini repeated the information, mentioned in our main article about his speech to a student organisation, that he has more than 3500 pages of evidence against the people in charge of Kahrizak. And he reiterated that there is independent evidence of the attempted murder of Kahrizak doctor Ramin Pourandarjan, who died last autumn. Ruholamini again singled out Ahmadinejad aide Saeed Mortazavi as the main suspect, saying the former Tehran prosecutor should accept the charges and resign instead of issuing political statements.
Ruholamini added the new claim that forces “behind the scenes” have been trying to get the families of victims to agree to silence, but he declared that he and some other families would “stand till the end”.
These claims, however, are only the set-up for Ruholamini’s political hammer blow: in a meeting with the Supreme Leader, “Ayatollah Khamenei supported my cause”.
And guess where the interview has been reprinted? Well, it is in two publications linked to the central plotters against President Ahmadinejad: Tabnak, linked to Mohsen Rezaei, and in Farda, which supports Mohammad Baqer-Qalibaf. Read the rest of this entry »
An interesting interview on CNN with Tehran University academic Seyed Mohammad Marandi over the Parliamentary report into detainee abuses, notably the violence and deaths at Kahrizak Prison. Below the analysis we have the video of CNN’s report on Kahrizak and Mortazavi, accompanied by an extract of the Marandi interview.
Note how quickly Marandi invokes the name of Abdolhossein Ruholamini, the medical professor and advisor to Presidential candidate Mohsen Rezaei, to declare “satisfaction” with the report and investigations by the Government, including the role of Ayatollah Khamenei. It was the death of Ruholamini’s son Mohsen in Kahrizak that spurred “conservative/principlist” pressure for the closure of the facility, which was ordered by the Supreme Leader this summer, and then for an enquiry. Read the rest of this entry »
1735 GMT: Making Stuff Up – The Twitter Attack. There’s not much to add to Austin Heap’s guest analysis for Enduring America this morning. Instead, The New York Times shows the power of pointless speculation, backed up by lack of any knowledge of important context, in an article by their technology writers:
Beth Jones, a senior threat researcher at the Internet security firm Sophos, said the attack did not look very sophisticated and probably was not the effort of a Web terrorist or other professional. “It could have been any number of people doing it,” she said. Ms. Jones said the incident may have been “hacktivism,” an attack with a social or political motivation. “The point could purely be just to prove the site is insecure,” she said
Just gonna say this one more time: if this was just “hacktivism” unrelated to the Iran internal crisis, why did the attackers first go after one of the Green Movement’s primary websites for news?
Enemies will not give up their devilish moves against the Iranian nation, they have brought their front to our streets and universities today and the battle is still on….Pointing to the enemy’s nonstop strategy to confront the Islamic Republic, the commander noted, “These moves form a chain of profound global plot against the Iranian nation….If we do not practice the necessary vigilance, we could (be obliged to) play in the enemy’s court.
The Newest Deal offers a bit of intriguing speculation: with the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony coming up on 10 December, will its recipient, one Barack Hussein Obama, take the occasion to note the political and human rights situation in Iran?
As President Obama’s nuclear negotiations with the Islamic Republic have dragged on, there have increasingly been calls — from the left, right, and the Iranian diaspora community — for Obama to couple his engagement on the nuclear front with a more direct condemnation of human rights abuses occurring inside of Iran. PBS and the BBC’s recent documentaries centered around the death of Neda Agha-Soltan, as well as the media blitz that has accompanied Newsweek’s Maziar Bahari’s release from detention in Iran, have only added to such calls.
This month’s suspicious death of an Iranian doctor who truthfully reported the results of an autopsy he performed on Mohsen Rouholamini, the son of a prominent conservative adviser to Mohsen Rezaei, has also been receiving significant coverage. (Ramin Pourandarjani, the doctor involved, had written in his report and testified to an investigatory committee that Rouholamini was tortured to death while incarcerated by Revolutionary Guard agents.) Suffice it to say, events such as these have certainly not helped the Obama administration frame the Iran issue in exclusively nuclear terms. Read the rest of this entry »
An admission: for the first time in three months, I feel very uncertain about an analysis. Up to this point, with the immense help of colleagues and readers, I could read and analyse the move of various participants in the post-election conflict, watching them act and react against each other. Even in mid-August, when we tried to figure out the manoeuvres of Hashemi Rafsanjani, I think we came to a secure conclusion about his complex, cautious steps.
Yesterday afternoon changed all this. We were in the midst of reading yet another turn of the kaleidoscope: an apparent alignment between the Supreme Leader and other elements in the Iranian Establishment to find a compromise that would contain the reformists by offering a limited “compromise”, thus securing the system. This would have entailed a loudly-proclaimed but strictly-defined enquiry into detentions and abuses, public but relatively gentle criticism of the President’s handling of the crisis, and perhaps the “Ramadan present” of a release of high-profile prisoners.
It seemed this was the latest but one of the most important chess moves in the conflict. Then at 3 p.m. Tehran time yesterday, 24 hours after security forces raided an office run by the staff of Mir Hossein Mousavi, someone — most likely, the President, working with the Revolutionary Guard — ordered the seizure of the main office of Mehdi Karroubi and the Etemade Melli political party and website, arresting the editor-in-chief of etemademelli.ir and perhaps shutting the site down. And a few hours after that, Mir Hossein Mousavi’s chief advisor, Alireza Beheshti, was arrested.
I think the difficulty in evaluating these steps is that Ahmadinejad is not playing chess. Dismissing our once-favourite cliche for a new analogy, with the attack on the Mousavi and Karroubi camps, the President and the Revolutionary Guards are palying cards, and they just put all their chips in the middle. Read the rest of this entry »
2020 GMT: One to Watch. The last posting on the Etemade Melli (Saham News) website, a full report on Mehdi Karroubi’s Eftar dinner party for the employees of the Etemade Melli newspaper), went up at 1:10 p.m. Tehran time (0840 GMT).
2015 GMT: In the midst of developments, this from Ayatollah Bayat-Zanjani’s address to members of a reformist faction earlier today (1510 GMT): “Power is not the foundation of legitimacy; rather legitimacy is the foundation of power. Some think that by playing with words they can change this.”
1945 GMT: I don’t think we realised this morning, when we chose the title for the updates, how appropriate the question would be.
1845 GMT: Press TV’s website has acknowledged the raid on Karroubi’s office with an account lifted word-for-word from the report in Parleman News (see 1340 GMT).
1710 GMT: A Revolutionary Guard official has said that the recent comments of IRGC Commander Mohammad Ali Jafari, claiming that former President Khatami and other reformists seek to “unseat” the regime, are “backed by evidence” given to Iran’s judiciary which the IRGC is willing to publish.
1555 GMT: The family of the late Ayatollah Taleghani, whose memorial ceremony was blocked by the Government for the first time since his death in 1979, have announced an alternative site for the gathering.
1510 GMT: Ayatollah Bayat-Zanjani, speaking to reformists, has claimed that the headquarters of the Supreme Leader no longer have any shame before God or people.
1340 GMT: URGENT Mehdi Karroubi’s office has been raided by security forces on the orders of Tehran’s chief prosecutor. CDs, documents, videos, and computers have been seized.
2015 GMT: Being a Detainee is Jolly Nice. Fars News has run an “interview” with Saeed Hajjarian in which the reformist politician expresses “his satisfaction about his condition in prison.” Hajjarian denies “being hospitalized, being subjected to harsh forms of torture or given mind-altering drugs.”
Hajjarian’s daughter Zeinab offers a different picture, writing Ayatollah Mousavi Ardebili, that her mother is under severe pressure from Government interrogators and that her father has told the authorities, “I have followed your dictates and announced that my situation in prison is satisfactory. Why don’t you leave my family alone?”
1405 GMT: There Goes My Visiting Professor Post at Tehran University. At Friday prayers in Tehran, Ayatollah Mohammad Emami Kashani has declared that the study of the humanities is very important but the subjects should be not be taught in “the Western style”.
Reuters’ take on the address is that Kashani tried to turn attention away from Iran’s legitimacy crisis towards its influence overseas: “It is now the time to export the revolution…it is not the time to treat each other like this. Such remarks cause damage to the Islamic society and prevent the export of the revolution.”
1355 GMT: Making Supreme Lemonade out of Cabinet Lemons. Full credit to Press TV and Fars News for their conversion of potential criticism of yesterday’s vote of confidence into high praise for the Supreme Leader.
Here was their challenge. The Vice Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, Mohammad Reza Bahonar, has revealed that up to 9 of the 21 Ministers nominated by President Ahmadinejad were not winning over the Parliament, “If we had not received the Leader’s recommendations, eight or nine ministers would have failed to win the vote of confidence. It would not have been a good start for the government.”
Hmm….that’s not high praise for Ahmadinejad’s people, and it seems to indicate the Supreme Leader interfered in a Parliamentary process. But wait. Press TV sticks that admission in the 7th paragraph, far below the “right” interpretation:
Iran’s vice speaker, Mohammad-Reza Bahonar, has hailed the Leader of the Islamic Revolution for providing Parliament with “friendly” guidance on clearing President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s nominees for his cabinet.
Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei “recommended that the government should start working at the earliest and with fullest capacity at the time when the country is faced with domestic and international crises and issues,” Fars News Agency quoted Bahonar as saying on Thursday.
1325 GMT: After a quiet morning, some items of interest are emerging. Khabar carries an interview with a Revolutionary Guard member describing the capture of leading reformists such as Saeed Hajjarian and the methods used to make them “confess”.
1035 GMT: Mohammad Reza Bahonar, a Deputy Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, has claimed that the Supreme Leader’s intervention was necessary for the approval of Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki and five other ministers (oil, industry, trade, cooperatives, and transport).
1030 GMT: We’ve just posted a warning about running too quickly with “news” on Iran, documenting how a satirical piece on Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi authorising rape of prisoners turned into “reality”.
0930 GMT: Still very quiet on news front, so we’ll happily note that Josh Shahryar’s excellent dissection of the “pro-Ahmadinejad” argument on the Iranian election — which we posted on Tuesday — has now made it to The Huffington Post.
0730 GMT: With news slowing after yesterday’s events in Parliament, we’ve taken the time to write an extended analysis of the current and future political and economic situation, “Has Ahmadinejad Won?” Thanks to all our readers, whose comments yesterday were invaluable.
Away from Parliament, the “40th day” memorial ceremony for Mohsen Ruholamini (pictured), who died in detention in Evin Prison, took place yesterday at Vali-e Asr Mosque in Tehran. Since Ruholamini’s father, Abdolhossein Ruholamini, is a prominent “conservative” political activist and advisor to Presidential candidate Mohsen Rezaei, the authorities posed no obstacle, as they have been with other memorials for slain protestors. We’ve posted the video in a separate entry.
2300 GMT: Urgent Correction on the Labour Front. Earlier today (1600 GMT) Tehran Bureau reported that the Tehran Bus Workers had called for civil disobedience over the case of jailed activist Mansur Osanloo. Tonight Iran Labour Report has issued an effective retraction of the story:
1735 GMT: Making Stuff Up – The Twitter Attack. There’s not much to add to 
2020 GMT: One to Watch. The 
Entries (RSS)