From 1 July 2009, Iranian students in the Netherlands were excluded from taking certain courses and visiting certain places if Iran could make use of their studies to develop nuclear weaponry. The students said the measure was discriminatory and went to court to prove it.
The restrictions are based on the two-year-old United Nations resolution 1737 that obliges UN member states to ensure that certain sensitive information cannot find its way to Iran. However, Behnam Taebi, spokesman for the Iranian students, maintains that the resolution says nothing about excluding students, specifically those pursuing a Master’s degree: “The Cabinet is assuming that students here intend to pass on information to Iran and that the type of information in a Master’s course – fairly fundamental, basic information – could be of use to the Iranian nuclear programme. These are two assumptions the Cabinet will have to defend.”
2045 GMT: Taking the Green Out of Iran. I don’t want to say the Government is in any way threatened by the Green movement, but somebody has apparently decided that, when President Ahmadinejad is speaking, the Iranian flag no longer has to be Red, White, and Green:
1620 GMT: All is Well. Really. Ahmad Khatami may have tried to put out the message that Hashemi Rafsanjani and the pro-Ahmadinejad Ayatollah Mohammad Yazdi have reconciled, but both Rah-e-Sabz and BBC Persian are claiming that Khatami has been pressing Rafsanjani not to publish his letter of grievance over Yazdi’s allegations of Rafsanjani’s irresponsibility and ambiguity.
1610 GMT: At Tehran Bureau, Setareh Sabety posts a poem reflecting on the executions of two “monarchists” (see 0940 GMT), “They Did Not Hang My Son Today”.
1605 GMT: Where’s Mahmoud? So how does President Ahmadinejad respond to the growing today? Well, with this declaration to officials in Tehran: “They (imperialist powers) seek to dominate energy resources of the Middle East….But the Iranian nation and other nations will not allow them to be successful.”
1600 GMT: Let Mehdi Make This Perfectly Clear. We can no longer keep up with Mehdi Karroubi as he hammers home his attack against the Ahmadinejad Government. We have posted his latest interview, this one with Saham News.
1530 GMT: The Dead and Detained. The Guardian of London has updated its list of those killed and arrested in the post-election crisis. There are now 1259 people, arranged alphabetically by first name.
1525 GMT: All is Well Alert. Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami wants everyone to know that Hashemi Rafsanjani and Ayatollah Mohammad Yazdi, who only a few days ago slammed Rafsanjani’s ambiguity, have made up and are now very good friends.
Beyond our smile, the possible significance: Government supporters are signalling to Rafsanjani that they will reduce the pressure on his family if he joins forces with them. Read the rest of this entry »
2250 GMT: The Regime Sacrifices Mortazavi (on US Television). What a way to close the evening. In an interview on CNN tonight, Tehran University academic Seyed Mohammad Marandi effectively gave up former Tehran Prosecutor General Saeed Mortazavi as the man responsible for the detainee abuses and deaths at Kahrizak Prison. We’ve got the video and a snap analysis.
1945 GMT: Don’t Look Now But…. Former 1st Vice President and Presidential ally Esfandiar Rahim-Mashai is handing out wisdom, according to Press TV: “The Islamic system’s adherence to keep an ‘unbreakable connection’ between its legitimacy and popularity is the key to its survival.”
Don’t want to rain on this supremacy parade, Mr R-M, but given recent developments (see 1035 GMT and 1100 GMT), you want to think about your own survival before pronouncing on that of the Islamic Republic. Read the rest of this entry »
What we wrote at 0745 GMT: “Some media were looking forward to today’s “5+1″ (US, UK, Russia, China, France, Germany) meeting on Iran’s nuclear programme. Even if that gathering had significance for the internal situation in Iran, it is unlikely to produce any results: China has declined to send a high-level official, blocking any move towards further sanctions on Tehran.”
What Associated Press reported an hour ago: “Top diplomats from six key powers focused on possible new sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program at a meeting Saturday, but reached no agreement, Russia’s deputy foreign minister said.”
2205 GMT: Writing in Exile. Nazila Fathi, The New York Times correspondent who fled her native country in June, has written an emotive account of post-election events and her departure. The article, however, also offers a powerful insight into how “new media” has re-shaped both opposition and coverage of it: Read the rest of this entry »
2110 GMT: Peyke Iran has published the news we heard earlier (see 1810 GMT) that all the detained Mothers of Mourning have been released.
1855 GMT: HomyLafayette has an excellent summary of information around the Mohammadi case.
1845 GMT: More on the Trial of the Baha’i (see 0725 GMT). An EA reader notes confusion over the court hearing for seven Baha’i members arrested in 2008 for “organizing riots”. Many accounts say the trial was today but one Iranian source reports that testimony began yesterday, a day early.
1815 GMT: Not A Nuclear Scientist. A highly reliable EA source checks in on the Professor’s case: “I hand checked all three UN black lists [of Iranian nuclear scientists]. Ali Mohammadi isn’t there.”
1800 GMT: Oh. My. Goodness. The Supreme Leader’s representative to the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps, Ali Saeedi, has reportedly declared that the the deaths of 75,000 people will be worthwhile if the Islamic Republic is preserved. 1745 GMT: The Presidential website has made a contribution to the Mohammadi story, declaring that the Iranian nation will have its “revenge” on the “enemies” who killed the professor. More info, however, on Mohammadi as a particle physicist: his faculty profile and a list of publications which complements those we noted earlier (1445 GMT).
The only problem with the report is that “the Iranian media sources” were not cited, and analysts, including EA contacts, could not recall seeing any news of a suspension.
Gary Sick has offered the following reading of latest US policy, with private manoeuvres and public “spin”, on Iran’s nuclear programme and sanctions.
My own reaction is that this is “too clever by half”, not on the part of the author but as attributed to Washington. As I wrote Sick, “Could it be that there there are two factions still battling within the Administraton? One faction, probably coming out of the State Department, is not as keen on aggressive sanctions. Linked to this is a wish to move the debate to the human rights rather than nuclear focus. The other faction, probably in the National Security Council and Department of Defense, is keener on a sanctions-first, nuclear-first focus. So they use New York Times as the ventriloquist’s dummy for their line. I’m not sure Obama is a central player in this battle.”
Sick’s concise response: “One of the great benefits of strategic leaking is that it conceals the real intentions of the leakers, thereby leaving interpretation up to the observer.”
Pretend for a moment that you are the president of the United States and you have gotten yourself into a bit of a hole with your Iran policy.
First you offered to negotiate with Iran over nuclear (and potentially other) issues without the Bush preconditions. But there were powerful political forces that felt this was an example of your inexperience and even appeasement tendencies. So you unwisely accepted a six month deadline for the negotiations to show that you meant business. You tried to soften that by saying you would take another look at the issue at the end of the year, but everyone ignored that and let you know that January 1 was the drop-dead date to solve all the negotiating problems with Iran. Read the rest of this entry »
We have a snap analysis of the interview in Today’s LiveBlog. The interview of the Basiji member to which interviewer Jon Snow refers is also on Enduring America:
Jon Snow: “Mr President do you accept that this country is at a cross roads? We are one week away from the end of the year and that the deadline when you have to give a response to the nuclear offer made by the P5+1.
“The P5 group that meets with Germany from the security council of the United Nations – apparently representing the security council that has made this proposal about enrichment taking the material outside the country, bringing it back. And they say by the end of this year that is the deadline for a response.”
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: “I think part of this question must be corrected. Actually we have given the proposal for the exchange of the fuel and according to the regulations they have to provide the fuel without any conditions. Read the rest of this entry »
An EA reader offers a guest article:
Comments Off 
Gary Sick has offered 
Entries (RSS)