New EA correspondent Cigdem Billur reports on some quiet but important missile manoeuvres in Eastern Europe:
Last year, the Obama Administration declared with great publicity that it was abandoning US plans for bases for Missile Defense in Eastern Europe. The “Star Wars” response of a satellite defense system would be replaced by a mobile system pointing towards Iran from the Persian Gulf.
Beyond the headlines, however, Washington is still planning a visible show of “defense” which concerns not Tehran but Moscow. Polish media are reporting that the US is placing a battery of Patriot missiles only 100 kilometres from the Russian border. Polish officials confirmed that the missiles will be deployed in the city of Morag, near Russia’s critical region Kaliningrad.
The Patriot system, of course, is not for high-level defense against incoming missiles. Its most famous use was the protection of Israel and Saudi Arabia from Iraqi Scud missiles in the 1990-91 Gulf War.
It remains to be seen, however, if Russia will make the distinction. Before the Obama withdrawal of the Missile Defense scheme, President Dmitri Medvedev had suggested that Russia would place Iskander (SS-26) tactical missiles on the Polish border near Kaliningrad. The step was never implemented, but could it be resurrected as a response to the Patriots?
Apparently a former Vice President spoke last night and said he kept the world safe and the current President doesn’t. Sort of like my Dad saying each time we meet, “You know in my day 1) there was no crime 2) kids knew their place 3) music was much better.”
HARRY SMITH: Madam Secretary, thank you so much for taking the time to speak with us.
CLINTON: Thank you, Harry.
SMITH: The president said, about this secret facility that’s been uncovered in Iran, that it is inconsistent with a peaceful nuclear program. What does the United States think this secret facility is for?
CLINTON: Well, we believe that it is a covert facility designed for uranium enrichment. It has not been disclosed. And therefore it raises additional suspicions about the Iranian intent regarding their nuclear program. Read the rest of this entry »
In an interview with the Daily Beast’s Gerald Posner, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former national security adviser to U.S. President Jimmy Carter, said on Sunday that President Obama’s scrapping missile defense was the right thing to do. The George W. Bush Administration’s defense missile shield project had been based on “a nonexistent defense technology, designed against a nonexistent threat”.
This, however, become an irrelevance next to Brzezinski’s more provocative assertion: Washington has to shoot down Israeli jets over Iraqi airspace if they are en route to attack Iran. This would be an example of US assertiveness to ensure the success of engagement with Tehran and Middle Eastern states. It would be a marker of a “strong strategy” backed-up with decisiveness, lacking in US foreign policy.
Transcript:
Is the Obama administration decision to end the missile-defense program the right one?
Well, let me first of all say that my view on this subject for the last two years has been that the Bush missile-shield proposal was based on a nonexistent defense technology, designed against a nonexistent threat, and designed to protect West Europeans, who weren’t asking for the protection.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Let me begin, though, by echoing the President’s statement yesterday concerning his approval of the recommendations not only of the Pentagon, but of his entire national security team to deploy a stronger and more comprehensive missile defense system in Europe. This decision came after a lengthy and in-depth review of our assessment of the threats posed, particularly the threat posed by Iran’s ballistic missile program, and the technology that we have today, and what might be available in the future to confront it. We believe this is a decision that will leave America stronger, and more capable of defending our troops, our interests, and our allies. Read the rest of this entry »
The article quotes Riki Ellison, chairman of the Missile Defence Advocacy Alliance, a Washington-based lobby group, “The signals that the generals in the Pentagon are sending are absolutely clear: as far as missile defence is concerned, the current US administration is searching for other solutions than the bases in Poland and the Czech Republic.” Read the rest of this entry »
As the advent of the Obama Administration brings back the “multipolar” in international relations, some of its most enthusiastic backers are in Moscow. During the Bush years, President Vladimir Putin publicly criticized Washington’s unilateralism. Sometimes the challenge was rhetorical to the “new bombs” of the US. Sometimes it was much more: when the Bush Administration tried to isolate Russia from NATO’s “impact zone” in Eastern Europe by proposing a missile umbrella in the Czech Republic and Poland, Putin raised the threat of a nuclear attack if Poland accepted a US missile interceptor base on its soil.
The intensity of attention to the “change” in Barack Obama’s rhetoric, especially toward the Israeli-Palestine/Arab problem, has contributed to this transformation. While Washington disowns the policies of the Bush era and puts pressure on Israel for sufficient concessions to start negotiations with Arab states, France has opened its first military base in the gulf region since the 1960s. And Russia becomes one of the first beneficiaries of the “soft power” of the US. Read the rest of this entry »
A Polish fella named Krystian Zimerman is apparently a hot-shot concert pianist. He’s tinkling the ivories in Los Angeles’ Disney Hall (named, you will note, after a great macho American) last week when he stops and announces that he ain’t playing no more. Seems he’s a bit upset about American military policies. Read the rest of this entry »
HARRY SMITH: Madam Secretary, thank you so much for taking the time to speak with us.
In an interview
Missile Defence in Israel and Turkey: Poland’s Wyborcza newspaper claims that 
As the advent of the Obama Administration brings back the “multipolar” in international relations, some of its most enthusiastic backers are in Moscow. During the Bush years, President Vladimir Putin publicly criticized Washington’s unilateralism. Sometimes the challenge was rhetorical to the “new bombs” of the US. Sometimes it was much more: when the Bush Administration tried to isolate Russia from NATO’s “impact zone” in Eastern Europe by proposing a missile umbrella in the Czech Republic and Poland, Putin raised the threat of 
Enduring America, your defender of all good and manly things red, white, and blue, 
Entries (RSS)