This is just an opening move, however. The Hamas delegation has to confirm the 12-month offer with the organisation’s leadership in Damascus, and it is linked to a full opening of Gazan borders. Israel’s offer of an 18-month cease-fire, presented by the Egyptians to Hamas, held out only a partial opening of crossings.
10:45 p.m. Soft Power, Tehran Style. While aid to Gaza is held up by Israeli restrictions, Iran continues to further its political objectives with assistance. Speaker of the Parliament Ali Larijani said today that Iran will rebuild the Gazan Parliament destroyed by Israeli air raids.
9:30 p.m. While there were no concrete results from the Cairo talks, Egypt is publicly rushing away from Israel and towards “the Palestinians”. In Brussels, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit appealed to Europeans to press Tel Aviv to ease the economic blockade, “I ask the European Union to do (things) very, very quickly to rebuild to help the Palestinians to get out of this crisis. We need to force the Israelis to negotiate and also tell them to open crossings and to give Palestinians a chance to live in a normal way.”
Gheit’s statement is more rhetoric than substance, however. Egypt is refusing to have foreign monitors on its side of the border, so it is effectively passing the buck to Israel, which is balking at an arrangement on the Gazan side.
Meanwhile, some Europeans are still stuck on the old script of the Palestinian Authority’s triumphant re-entry into Gaza. British Foreign Secretary David Miliband proclaimed, “”The reunification of the Palestinians under the recognised and cherished voice of President Abbas is so important.”
Photo by Sameh Habeeb (see updates at 8:45 a.m. and 10:40 a.m.)
12:50 p.m. A steady as she goes day. Israeli officials kept quiet to judge the reaction their “unilateral cease-fire” — whether the spin that Israeli forces are withdrawing as a present to President Obama will become clear in 24 hours. Arab states chose a surface appearance of consensus over the political issues that are redefining their relations; whether that changes tomorrow will be up to Syria. Some Europeans, far too late, decided to make a push for a settlement.
And all eyes turn to Washington where a new President is inaugurated, with the question of what the US might do to re-define the Gaza equation. My own suspicion is that Obama and his advisors are playing catch-up, so don’t expect much beyond the surface naming of officials and maybe envoys to consider the American approach.
Good night and peace to all.
11:45 p.m. More Better Late than Never, Europe Style: European Foreign Ministers invite their Middle Eastern counterparts to Brussels for a bit of a chinwag later this week.
9:45 p.m. Further to Rafah Kid’s blog on Israeli use of white phosphorous (5:30 p.m.) and the revelations of the mass killing at Khuza’a (yesterday’s updates), The Guardian of London has posted a report, accompanied by a video of white phosphorous and of the effects on civilian victims.
8:40 p.m. Better Late than Never? After Europe’s ineffective performance at the start of the Gaza conflict, the European Union has tried to recover some influence. German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier has proposed, after consultations with EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana and Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg, the current EU President, “humanitarian action, the prevention of illicit arms trafficking, re-opening crossing points into Gaza, help with reconstruction, and a resumption of the peace process”.
The significance of the move probably lies not in any potential for success but in the politics behind it: “Steinmeier wanted to ensure the United States alone did not lead diplomatic efforts in the region.”
8:25 p.m. Amnesty International has criticised Israeli deployment of white phosphorous weapons: “Such extensive use of this weapon in Gaza’s densely populated residential neighborhoods is inherently indiscriminate. Its repeated use in this manner, despite evidence of its indiscriminate effects and its toll on civilians, is a war crime.”
An Israeli military spokesman has replied, “”In response to the claims … relating to the use of phosphorus weapons, and in order to remove any ambiguity, an investigative team has been established in southern command to look into the issue.”
8:15 p.m. Ghassan al-Khatib, former Palestinian Minister of Planning says “no ways” for reconstruction aid or materials to get into Gaza under current conditions.
I think rebuilding of Gaza might be a way off.
5:30 p.m. Rafah Kid continues to offer essential reporting from Gaza: his latest entry describes the Israeli attacks, civilian casualties, and the situation in Gazan hospitals. His description of “chemical burns” and “an unextinguished incendiary device” points to the use of white phosphorous. If Palestinians and Israelis do not agree, then an “international mechanism” will have to be found to deliver the aid.
Rafah Kid also describes the killing of a local farmer by Israeli troops after the start of the cease-fire.
5:20 p.m. Update on the Kuwait summit: shadow Arab unity? Sheikh Hamad, the Qatari Prime Minister, issued what was in effect a holding statement, praising “a reconciliation led today by [Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah] with … the emir of Kuwait…. We left with an understanding that undoubtedly a new page had been turned that would benefit and strengthen the Arab position.”
It could well be that Saudi economic clout has brought all Arab countries onto the political fence, but it would be well worth keeping an eye on the next signals out of Syria.
5:15 p.m. Welcome to the Re-Occupation, however. Israeli officials say, “Israel intends to exert control over the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip following its 22-day offensive, and is seeking guarantees that no U.N. projects will benefit Hamas.”
Bottom line: no recognition of Hamas, no lifting of economic restrictions, including the “freeing” of border crossings.
5:10 p.m. Situation is little changed on military front, with no resumption of violence but no further developments on the Israeli withdrawal.
5 p.m. Have just finished set of media interviews on Obama inauguration with Birmingham radio stations and on Gaza with Iranian News Agency
2:35 p.m. Latest from the Kuwait Summit: Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas has made his plea to have some role in Gaza, though I am not sure he has thought through his suggestion of “simultaneous” Presidential and parliamentary elections: at this point, he and Fatah might be hard-pressed to win in sections of the West Bank and Gaza.
Abbas does have one vote, however: the hopeless-beyond-hapless United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon has urged Arab leaders to support Abbas as head of a Palestinian unity government. And, behind the scenes, a “senior European official” has tried to support the plan by saying that “there will be no international assistance to rebuild Gaza’s infrastructure with Hamas in power”.
All of this appears somewhat desperate, an impression not lost on Syrian President Bashir al-Assad as he pressed his political advantage of support for Hamas. He has called for the declaration of Israel as “a terrorist state”.
Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, sits firmly on the fence. King Abdullah has tried to deflect the political issues by promising $1 billion in reconstruction assistance to Gaza — a declaration that only has salience if Israel, backed by the US and Europe, allows the aid. He has also declared that “one drop of Palestinian blood” is worth more than all the money in the world, which I am sure will comforting any bleeding Gazans who hear the statement.
2:25 p.m. Meanwhile, Turkey has bailed out of the Egyptian proposals. Following Hosni Mubarak’s announcement that Egypt would never accept international monitors on its side of the Egypt-Gaza border, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has withdrawn Turkey’s offer to participate in an international force.
2 p.m. Trying to recover his position, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has told the Arab economic summit at Kuwait: “What is required, if we were to agree and I hope we shall agree, is a national unity government that undertakes … lifting the (Israeli) blockade, opening the crossings, reconstruction and holding simultaneous presidential and legislative elections.”
Abbas’s position is tenuous because his term as President of the West Bank expired last week. The PA-controlled Ministry of Justice in Ramallah decided that Abbas’s term would be extended until 25 January to coincide with the end of the legislative term, but Hamas have announced their intentions to declare an “interim” President for the West Bank.
11:40 a.m. Hamas military spokesman Abu Obeida says the organisation will re-arm despite the Israeli agreement with the US and European countries to block shipments: “Do whatever you want. Manufacturing the holy weapons is our mission and we know how to acquire weapons,”
When I asked Mr Ban [UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon] if he would consider a UN war crimes tribunal in Gaza, he said this would not be for him to “determine”. But only a few journalists bothered to listen to him and his officials were quickly folding up the UN flag on the table.
Even in the darkness, we could see the piles of rubble: one had been the police station, destroyed in the heavy bombing on the first day of Israel’s offensive, killing 22 Hamas policemen; another pile accounted for the houses that had been destroyed around Muntasa, a favoured children’s play area and park which the Israelis say militants had used for firing rockets – residents deny the claim. The park is no more, a field of smashed masonry and concrete.
11:10 a.m. Israeli military says that it is withdrawing some reservists but regular units are holding their positions.
11:o5 a.m. “Utter devastation”: With no diplomatic or military developments, Al Jazeera and Press TV are giving extensive coverage to the scale of the destruction from the Israeli assault. Other news services in Britain, including CNN, have moved to other stories.
10:40 a.m. Sometimes Internet activism works….We updated two hours ago on the removal of photojournalist Sameh Habeeb’s album from the Google-owned Picasa website for “violation of Terms of Service”. Well, after a lot of cyber-chatter, the album has reappeared.
Unlike Hizbullah, [Hamas] cannot credibly claim to have fought bravely against the IDF. Its fighters, rather, melted away into the deepest recesses of civilian protection. And while the likes of Marzouk and his colleague Khaled Mashaal sounded consistently indomitable from the comfort and safety of the Syrian capital, the local Gaza leadership simply hid….
But will the people of Gaza, who chose Hamas as their leadership three years ago, internalize any of this?…. Will Gazans get the message? Or, confronted with the ruins all around them, will they instead redouble their hostility to Israel, forgive Hamas what was either cynicism or foolishness, and rededicate themselves to helping their elected Islamist leadership to eventually prevail over the Zionists?
8:45 a.m. More on photojournalist Sameh Habeeb, whose reports from Gaza have been a vital first-hand source during the conflict. Picasa has bravely removed his entire album of photographs because “the content…violates our Terms of Service”.
8:10 a.m. More background on the run-up to the conflict, this time from the humanitarian front. The UN’s chief humanitarian co-ordinator in Israel, Maxwell Gaylard, says that Tel Aviv that “deliberately blocked the United Nations from building up vital food supplies in Gaza that feed a million people daily”.
A spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry replied that the claim is “unqualified bullshit”.
Morning update (8 a.m. Israel/Gaza time): Little military action overnight, as both Israel and Hamas settled into their political and military positions. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert says there will be a pullout “with highest possible speed” if “the cease-fire remains stable”. Hamas leaders are claiming victory in their resistance to the Israeli invasion.
Almost 100 bodies were pulled out of the Gazan rubble yesterday, including 23 from the site of the Zeitoun mass killing of members of the al-Samouni clan. Despite statements from survivors that “it was an intentional massacre”, the Israeli military continues to deny any responsibility: “”The [Israel Defense Forces] is not familiar with any order to civilians to enter any particular building. The IDF does not give those orders.”
With the Israeli destruction and bulldozing of more than 4000 buildings and houses, ten of thousands of Gazans are homeless. Ambulances and aid, including medical supplies, are still blocked at the Egypt-Gaza border, and only a few dozen wounded Gazans were brought into Egypt for treatment.
1 a.m. Last night we closed with: “At the very least, I’m grateful that there has been a cessation of violence in Gaza. My concern is that we’re at the start of a different phase which will not bring resolution but further hardship.”
More of the same tonight. Today has been for mourning rather than dying — only one death from violence to my knowledge, while close to 100 bodies have been pulled from the rubble. There appears to be a very gradual Israeli pullback from the edges of the cities as they re-trench in their military occupation.
The politics today was posturing, as a lot of leaders tried to figure out how to respond to Israel’s unilateral “cease-fire”. The Europeans appear to be paralysed, as they await a President Obama, while Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak is scrambling to save his personal position. The Saudis have gone into hiding.
That means that the diplomatic baton — perhaps unexpectedly, if you scripted this a month ago — passes to Syria and other countries pursuing a stronger line in favour of Hamas. They will be at the Arab countries’ economic summit in Kuwait tomorrow, and it will be interesting to see how forthright they take their position to Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
The main question remains: how long will Israel hold out with its re-occupation in the hope that Hamas will crumble?
Late evening update (2 a.m. Israel/Gaza time): Relatively quiet on all fronts the last few hours. A hectic diplomatic day but a comparatively quiet military day, as Israeli troops battled with “at least 20 armed gunmen” Friday and five civilians were wounded when 15 rockets were fired into southern Israel.
Everyone is drawing breath, but it will pick up in several hours. Saturday is the day that Israel makes its move and puts all other actors on the spot, as the Cabinet declares a unilateral ceasefire. It is a giant snub to “world opinion”, saying that Tel Aviv doesn’t need an international agreement to get its political and military objectives. Gaza will still be blockaded, Israel will remain freedom of action to send military forces in whenever it wants, and Hamas will go unrecognised.
The responses of other countries and groups to this move will be critical. Is Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak really prepared to be tied at the hip to Israel, in pursuit of the overthrow of Hamas, even though it may damage Cairo’s position in the Arab world and even threaten internal instability? Will Saudi Arabia continue to stall on meaningful cease-fire efforts or, in light of growing internal concern with the Government position, will it shift towards other Gulf States who are demanding support of Hamas and unequivocal condemnation of Israel? Can Syria and Iran press their diplomatic initiative in forging a new bloc, and can Khaled Meshaall benefit?
And what in the world is Barack Obama doing? Did his people know of the Israeli plans, given Tzipi Livni’s presence in Washington today, and tacitly approve them? Or have they sat so far back that they are trailing behind these developments?
No answers, just a lot of questions. But my speculation is that tomorrow will send a re-alignment of loyalties and objectives that ensures the political battle over Gaza enters a new phase.
Update: Make of this what you will — Rafah Kid has posted on Twitter, “Seriously they always use banned stuff…the dum dum bullets are back too…small entry and MASSIVE exit hole..noone cares”
In today’s Ha’aretz, Amira Haas not only dares to ask, “Is Israel using illegal weapons in Gaza?”, but uses reports and the expertise of military analyst Mark Garlasco to give a definitive and detailed Yes.
Garlasco confirms the use of white phosphorous and suggests it arises from “conclusions drawn from the Second Lebanon War, in which the IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] lost many tanks”. He also notes the first use in warfare of the GPS-guided mortar, with an unexpected range of error that led to the bombing of the Jabaliya school/shelter, and he confirms the use of the US-supplied “bunker-busting bomb” GBU-39.
Entries (RSS)