My kids are no longer kids: my son is 13 and my daughter is 10 going on 18. But, as I am driving, it still happens. First, a sharp one-liner, then a squeal, and a quick escalation to a scuffle and “Dad!”. I just keep my eyes on the road, trying not to notice.
Well, President Obama has given his annual set-piece speech, the Washington pundits have pronounced, and already everyone “in the know” are rubbing hands over the forthcoming showdowns between the White House and Congress over domestic issues. And all the while I’m thinking about this speech….
When it comes to the US beyond Capitol Hill and its borders, President Obama just tried to ignore the kids in the backseat.
That’s far from a shocking response. Obama’s immediate road ahead, for his future and that of the US, is the economy and health care. Having bailed out a leaking ship last year, the Administration now has to show progress on employment; otherwise, the Republicans, even though it was their eight years in the White House that set up the debacle and even though they have put forth no alternatives for the way out of recession, can just keep hammering away at White House failure. As for health care, what should be the overriding issue — an expensive, inefficient US system will continue to leave millions of Americans unprotected — is being replaced by the politics of display: the Obama Administration needs a bill, no matter how watered down, just to show that it is not captive to the blows of the Republican minority in Congress.
Not surprising then that the President only devoted eight out of 60+ minutes to affairs beyond the US. What is more significant, of course, is what was in those eight minutes.
UPDATE 0635 GMT: Ohmygod, this must be totally true because the editorial page of The Washington Post just said so . How do they know? Well, because of thorough investigative reporting which ventured as far as down the street: “The opening of Venezuela’s banks to the Iranians guarantees the continued development of nuclear technology and long-range missiles,” Mr. Morgenthau said in a briefing this week in Washington at the Brookings Institution. “The mysterious manufacturing plants, controlled by Iran deep in the interior of Venezuela, give even greater concern.”
With the groundwork laid years ago, we are entering a period where the fruits of the Iran-Venezuela bond will begin to ripen.
That means two of the world’s most dangerous regimes, the self-described “axis of unity,” will be acting together in our backyard on the development of nuclear and missile technology. And it seems that terrorist groups have found the perfect operating ground for training and planning, and financing their activities through narco-trafficking.
The Iranian nuclear and long-range missile threats, and creeping Iranian influence in the Western Hemisphere, cannot be overlooked.
Now this statement has angered some old Lefties, like a Mr Robert Dreyfuss of the scandal rag The Nation, who is pictured at right because he looks a bit like a Communist:
This is both creepy and conspiratorial, with almost no facts, and full of rhetoric and dark insinuations.
2110 GMT: According to his son, pro-reform journalist Isa Saharkhiz has been seized and taken to an undisclosed location.
2015 GMT:Reports that women’s rights activist Zeynab Peyghambarzadeh was arrested today in the “Mothers of Martyrs” rally in Laleh Park.
2000 GMT: Now This is Interesting. According to Iran Labor News Agency, Former President Hashemi Rafsanjani, in a meeting with the families of detainees, has said post-election events had caused “bitterness” while denying there was a power struggle in the Islamic state: “I don’t think that (anybody with a) vigilant conscience is satisfied with the current situation.”
Rafsanjani’s manoeuvre should be seen as an attempt to get as much political leverage as possible while distancing himself from any call for massive change: “I hope with good management and wisdom the issues would be settled in the next days and the situation could improve … We should think about protecting the system’s long-term interests.”
So Iran’s ultimate politician is not going to make any challenge to the Supreme Leader. But here is the unknown from the interview: what does he propose as the fate of President Ahmadinejad? Read the rest of this entry »
2230 GMT: We’re signing off until the morning. Thanks to everyone who sent us information today. To friends in Iran: our thoughts are with you.
2200 GMT: We have now posted the English translation of the letter released by Mir Hossein Mousavi to his supporters this afternoon.l
2145 GMT: In addition to the video of this afternoon’s protests in Tehran, which we posted in this entry, we now have posted footage that the riots have spread this evening to the university in Shiraz and to the city of Mashhad..
Yesterday’s analysis of Iran’s Presidential elections sparked a lively debate on whether the results will be honoured. An initial note is that today is only the first round, with the likely outcome of President Ahmadinejad and former Prime Minister Mir Hossein Mousavi as the top two candidates; the crunch question over an “acceptable” vote would come in the following week’s second-round decider.
That said, an article by Robert Dreyfuss of The Nation, one of the better “Western” reporters in Tehran, offered these observations:
There’s worry and anger about cheating and unfair campaigning. Yesterday, the state-run Iranian TV gave Ahmadinejad twenty minutes of free air time for a speech, while offering one minute each to his three rivals. (They turned it down contemptuously.)
I’m going to take another 24 hours to sift through the reactions to President Obama’s speech in Cairo, but the general perception is that it has been well-received in the US. There were expected levels of idiocy (Joe Pagliarulo on The Glenn Beck Program that Obama should have done what Ronald Reagan would have, telling moderate Muslims to love America or ”live in your cave”) and political confrontation (Liz Cheney, who is clearly making her move from State Department bureaucrat and Vice President’s daughter to rising Republican star, scoffing at Obama’s “hand-holding” in a world of “terrorism,…the slaughter of innocents, and Iran’s hegemonic hopes for the Middle East”); however, even former Bush Administration officials like Peter Feaver declared, “For the most part, I think [Obama] did what he had to do,” and The Wall Street Journal gave support, albeit through the fatuous and misleading claim, “Barack Hussein Bush”.
There was sustained criticism of Obama’s presentation from Noam Chomsky, who saw no substance apart from Israel-Palestine, where Obama was continuing “the path of unilateral US rejectionism”. Yet other analysts who have been hostile to the President’s interventions in Afghanistan and Pakistan were positive about this engagement with the Middle East; Robert Dreyfuss wrote, “Obama hit a home run.”
In addition to the shrewd observations of Canuckistan and Chris E on my original analysis, I was particularly struck by the evaluation of Marc Lynch, which had high praise for Obama’s “thoughtful, nuanced and challenging reflection on America’s relations with the Muslims around the world”. At the same time, I think there is a convergence of possible weakness both in this evaluation and the speech of the President. Lynch’s question on Israel and Palestine, “How will the U.S. and the international community support…non-violent action and redeem…moral authority?”, could be applied to Obama’s vagueness on plans beyond an initial challenge to the Israeli expansion of settlements.
Eighteen hours since Barack Obama laid out the strategy by which the United States will defeat Al Qa’eda and “terrorists” in Afghanistan, 24 hours after we projected both the Administration’s approach and the problems with it, I have to say….
Iran’s Press TV is a bit over-the-top with its proclamation of “simmering talks of war”, but the attention to Tehran, rather than other Middle Eastern issues, is more than justified. While interchanges between Israeli and American military leaders, as part of Tel Aviv’s special relationship with the US, are commonplace, the presence of Ross at the discussions is significant. So is the timing. Read the rest of this entry »
My kids are no longer kids: my son is 13 and my daughter is 10 going on 18. But, as I am driving, it still happens. First, a sharp one-liner, then a squeal, and a quick escalation to a scuffle and “Dad!”. I just keep my eyes on the road, trying not to notice.
Now this statement has angered some old Lefties, like a Mr Robert Dreyfuss of the scandal rag The Nation, who is pictured at right because he looks a bit like a Communist:
Eighteen hours since Barack Obama laid out the strategy by which the United States will defeat Al Qa’eda and “terrorists” in Afghanistan, 24 hours after we projected both the Administration’s approach and the problems with it, I have to say….
Here’s a story that has set a few tongues wagging and minds racing on the Internet.
Entries (RSS)