Afghanistan: The Danger of Washington’s “Experts” on Intervention
Posted by Scott Lucas in Afghanistan, US Foreign Policy
On the eve of President Obama’s announcement on the next steps for the US in Afghanistan — expect a public escalation of 30,000 more troops and a lot of rhetoric about non-military programmes and the necessity for the Afghan Government to be free from corruption and to take responsibility for security — The Security Crank offers a loud, troubling polemic against so-called “expertise” in Washington.
It’s settled: the discussion about Afghanistan is no longer about Afghanistan. It is, instead, now a contest of who can write the most ridiculous article demonstrating their ignorance of the country. This isn’t a small deal: most of the people we’ll highlight below hold positions of great influence, including on General McChrystal’s review team this past summer. But they are all, pro- and anti-war, morons.
Afghanistan-Pakistan Video & Text: US Envoy Holbrooke Briefing (23 November)
It’s important to note that these opinion-mongers are not operating in a vacuum—they have willing accomplices in the media, most of which is utterly subservient to the U.S. military. In a lot of cases, this change is recent: Dexter Filkins, for example, used to write hard-hitting, critical pieces about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now, he writes this:
Read the rest of this entry »








Entries (RSS)