Scientific Update: How Can There Be Non-Conservatives?

Conservapedia continues to amaze us with the rapid development of its special section, "Why do Non-Conservatives Exist?". We're especially impressed with the "scientific" calculations now defining the reasons for liberal deviance.

It's heartening, for example, to see that colleagues and I are responsible for "20% [who] refuse to let go of their...desire for a sense of acceptance by liberal friends or teachers", but I'm personally encouraged by "20% who] refuse to rise above their personal temptations, often self-destructive, to act in a way that conflicts with conservative values, such as irresponsible sexual promiscuity".

Of course, I have asked Mike Dunn to set up our own Enduring America poll to support Conservapedia's findings.



Those Scientific Findings in Full

40%: did not hear about conservative principles and the logic behind them until after they made up their mind, perhaps due to pervasive societal bias, and refuse to reconsider

20%: refuse to rise above their personal temptations, often self-destructive, to act in a way that conflicts with conservative values, such as irresponsible sexual promiscuity

20%: refuse to let go of their past, or let go of their desire for a sense of acceptance by liberal friends or teachers

10%: work in a job having a salary dependent on keeping conservatives out of power, such as public school teachers, and refuse to rise above self-interest

5%: were told off or disciplined once by a conservative, often a parent, and refuse to rise above the animosity.

5%: like an anarchist, genuinely want to believe in and propagate destructive ideas.