Saturday
Feb282009
War on Terror Watch: Obama's Crew Trying, Failing to Halt Court Cases on Surveillance
Saturday, February 28, 2009 at 10:23
Another episode in the Obama tale of "Not What We Say But What We Do" in the War on Terror:
On Friday, a US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the claim of Obama's Justice Department that surveillance without warrants (if you prefer, "domestic spying"), a procedure extended by the Bush Administration, came under the category of "state secrets" and could not be reviewed by the courts.
The case arose when Bush officials accidentally sent classified documents to the lawyers of a charity, the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, being investigated by the Treasury Department. The documents covered attorney-client discussions which were monitored by the National Security Agency.
In a second case, on Wednesday Justice Department lawyers vigorously supported Congressional legislation which granted full immunity to US telecommunications companies that participated in the Bush Administration's domestic surveillance programme.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation of San Francisco approached the US District Court to rule that the activity of the telecommunications companies was unconstitutional. Government lawyers responded, "[This] is the law of the land, and as such the Department of Justice defends it in court."
As a Senator of Illinois, Obama said he opposed the immunity clause but supported the bill for warrantless surveillance which included it.
On Friday, a US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the claim of Obama's Justice Department that surveillance without warrants (if you prefer, "domestic spying"), a procedure extended by the Bush Administration, came under the category of "state secrets" and could not be reviewed by the courts.
The case arose when Bush officials accidentally sent classified documents to the lawyers of a charity, the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, being investigated by the Treasury Department. The documents covered attorney-client discussions which were monitored by the National Security Agency.
In a second case, on Wednesday Justice Department lawyers vigorously supported Congressional legislation which granted full immunity to US telecommunications companies that participated in the Bush Administration's domestic surveillance programme.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation of San Francisco approached the US District Court to rule that the activity of the telecommunications companies was unconstitutional. Government lawyers responded, "[This] is the law of the land, and as such the Department of Justice defends it in court."
As a Senator of Illinois, Obama said he opposed the immunity clause but supported the bill for warrantless surveillance which included it.
Reader Comments