Iran Election Guide

Donate to EAWV





Or, click to learn more

Search

« Mahmoud Abbas: "Israel Does Not Want Peace but We Do" | Main | Iran: A List of Journalists Detained Since 12 June »
Sunday
Nov082009

The Latest from Iran (8 November): Challenge Renewing?

NEW Latest Iran Video: Mehdi Karroubi on the 13 Aban Protests
NEW Iran: An Opposition Renewing, A Government in Trouble
Iran: Question for the Regime “What’s Your Next Punch?”
NEW Latest Iran Video: More from 13 Aban & from Today (8 November)
Iran’s New 13 Aban: An Eyewitness Account “I Have Never Seen as Much Violence”
Iran: Josh Shahryar on the Significance of 13 Aban
The Latest from Iran (7 November): Regrouping

Receive our latest updates by email or RSS SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEED
Buy Us A Cup of Coffee? Help Enduring America Expand Its Coverage and Analysis

IRAN 4 NOV 82215 GMT: On? Off? Well, I guess for a day that started with a projection of Government uncertainty, it is appropriate that it should end that way. Having said on Saturday that Iran could reject the Vienna enrichment deal, top lawmaker Alaeddin Boroujerdi http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world/view/1016801/1/.html on Sunday, "Our first option is to buy fuel of 20 per cent (enrichment). But if we cannot buy it we could make a limited exchange on condition that first we get fuel of 20 per cent."

So is Boroujerdi shifting in recognition that pro-deal forces have pressed ahead (see 1640 GMT)? Or is he just manoeuvring for a better position, working with allies, to hold out against any agreement?

2030 GMT: Another day with some releases from prison and some cases going to trial. The file of Mohsen Aminzadeh, Deputy Foreign Minister in the Khatami Government, has been sent to the Revolutionary Court.

1930 GMT: An Iranian blogger reports that Mohammad-Hossein Saffar-Harandi, the former Minister of Culture and Islamic Guidance, was met by sustained protests when he visited Gilan University in northern Iran today and left to shouts of "Murderer, Get Out!". We have video in a separate entry.

1850 GMT: Three Iranian judges have reported been fired because of their connection with the Kahrizak Prison, infamous for alleged abuse of detainees.

1640 GMT: Nuclear Deal On? Yes, the Ahmadinejad Government is pressing ahead, despite objections from within the establishment.

"Diplomats close to nuclear negotiations" say that Iran will offer a two-stage delivery of uranium to be enriched in Russia. Each delivery will consist of 400 kilogrammes. The total of 800 kilogrammes, or just over half of Iran's current stock of uranium, compares with a single delivery of 1200 kilogrammes in the proposal from October's Vienna talks.

The revelation of Iran's counter-offer may have been prompted by the gathering flurry of voice in Iran's state media saying no deal was possible (see yesterday's updates and 1300 GMT). Or it may be connected with a visit, reported in Fars News, of Soviet Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov to Tehran.

1620 GMT: Presidential Confusion. Here's the latest explanation for why Ahmadinejad did not appear last night. He was going to speak about his subsidy reform bill but then decided not to appear, since this might pre-empt Parliament's discussion on the measure today. The director of his Public Relations Department now says, "The interview is slated for next week." He added:
Such a relation [between postponement and Parliament's subsidy reform discussions] cannot be denied but other issues may also be involved. However, what Fars news agency has issued is not what we announced and they have offered their own comment. Actually it will be disrespectful to people if we declare that the interview was not conducted due to the president's other engagements.

Understand that? I don't. Accept it? No again.

1605 GMT: For What It's Worth. Parliament's National Security Commission has announced that it will investigate the events of 13 Aban.

1545 GMT: Correction on the Bread Story. An EA correspondent checks in to clarify the economic situation in Iran:
The rising bread prices in Tehran are not a result of the subsidy plan, which has not even been ratified by the Majlis [Parliament] or the Guardian Council. The changes in Tehran's bread prices stem from the Government's experiment with higher-quality wheat in the bread. For this they have to charge more, even with the subsidized price, to bakers. They first did this in Karaj (a suburb of Tehran) after the election. No bread riots there, even though it is a poorer area. Then they expanded it through Tehran slowly.

1535 GMT: Rafsanjani Surfaces. The former President has met members of Parliament from the Western Provinces. He has once again called for a constructive social and political dialogue. Implicitly criticising  post-election coverage by state media, he said concerns must be heard and the creation of unity through due legal process and avoidance of extreme and divisive actions is a necessity.

1510 GMT: Appearing in Revolutionary Court, Behzad Nabavi, a senior member of the reformist Mojahedin of Islamic Revolution party, has denied all charges against him.

1310 GMT: Mediaflash --- Iranian Politics Makes Washington Post Columnist's Head Explode. It's not just the headline of David Ignatius' column, "Iran's 'Great Satan' addiction", that indicates ill-informed stereotype and hysterical pseudo-analysis is to follow. There is his ignorance of any aspect to the Iranian post-election crisis other than the "nuclear issue" and his reduction of Iran's politics to Ahmadinejad v. the Reformists (and then Khamenei Jumps In).

What really gives offence is that Ignatius won't admit that the "Great Satan" problem lies not with the Green movement but with his own inability to appreciate 1) that opposing the regime does not necessarily mean giving up a claim to Iran's sovereignty over nuclear energy and 2) that opposition to Ahmadinejad's tactics of negotiation with the US has more to do with criticism of the President's quest for legitimacy than it does with anti-Americanism. Thus this well-connected Washington columnist throws out the Green opposition as a movement tainted with an incurable Iranian disease:
Rather than speak up for dialogue with the United States, many of the reformists gathered around former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi decided instead to score political points against Ahmadinejad. The past month has been a reminder that the very existence and legitimacy of Khamenei's regime are interwoven with a defiant anti-Americanism. This legacy infects even the reformers who protest against Khamenei.

1300 GMT: Nuclear Deal Off?A "well-informed" Iranian source has rejected the compromise "third-party enrichment" proposal of Mohammad El Baradei, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Only yesterday Iranian state media were featuring El Baradei's suggestion Turkey to replace France as the third country with Russia and Iran in the enrichment plan, but the source claims, "It seems the IAEA chief is trying to take advantage of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's visit to Turkey to gain media coverage on a closed issue."

It remains to be seen whether the source is part of the Ahmadinejad camp, indicating that third-party enrichment is now dead as a negotiating possibliity, or whether he is connected to Iranian politicians trying to undermine the deal (and possibly the President).

1255 GMT: An Ahmadinejad Victory. Amidst the apparent turmoil within the Government, the President did pick up a big win on Sunday when the Parliament approved proposals to redistribute money saved from subsidy cuts. The Parliament, however, retains a say in the plan, as the cash in the state budget where the legislators have oversight powers.

1145 GMT: Press TV is now featuring news of Ali Larijani's meeting with senior Iraqi clerics, including Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. Unsurprisingly, there are no indications of whether the talks focused on Iranian or Iraqi politics, only general platitudes such as Larijani "underlin[ing] the importance of religious authorities' viewpoints in resolving various issues among Muslims".

0910 GMT: We have posted Mehdi Karroubi's video statement on 13 Aban.

0835 GMT: With news coming in of the Karroubi video and uncertainty over Ahmadinejad's moves, we've split off our initial update as a separate analysis, "An Opposition Renewing, A Government in Trouble".

0825 GMT: Yes, Challenge Renewing. Mehdi Karroubi has just released a video statement on the 13 Aban protests. He declares that the Government has failed to put down the opposition with force and points to the Ahmadinejad hypocrisy of backing anti-US protests while negotiating with Washington.

0815 GMT: Busted! Ahmadinejad's Cancelled Speech and the Trip to Ankara. And here is the revelation that the President's 2nd postponement of his post-13 Aban speech is a sign of a Government in trouble. From the Chinese news service Xinhua:
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will depart to Turkey on Nov. 8 to take part in the economic summit of Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in the country, the official IRNA news agency reported on Monday.

So Ahmadinejad knew he was going to Turkey 48 hours before 13 Aban. And that exposes his excuse, more than 48 hours after 13 Aban, that he had to cancel his Saturday speech because he suddenly noticed he was going to Ankara.

0750 GMT: Will Russia Shift on Sanctions? As those opposed to the enrichment deal sent out their message yesterday through MP Alaeddin Boroujerdi, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev declared, in an interview with Germany's Der Spiegel magazine, that Iran must abide by international rules and not hide its nuclear facilities. He added that it would be better to avoid sanctions, but they cannot be excluded if there is no progress in the talks.

It should be remembered that Medvedev offered a similar statement after the "revelation" of the second enrichment facility in September and that Der Spiegel has a tendency towards sensationalism in its coverage of Iran. So this feels more like a bit of pressure from Moscow for Iran to keep negotiating on an enrichment deal, rather than a threat of imminent sanctions.

0735 GMT: A Symbol? Today's update picture (left) is of an empty University classroom. The inscription on the wall, "Death to Khamenei".

Reader Comments (34)

The more I think about it, I think "The Time Machine" from 1960 is a perfect allegory for Iran today. The students/green movement are the eloi, the basij and hardlines are the Morlocks, and the machines that have to be destroyed are Iran's oil industry. The relevant scene here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSVCOU1cw4k&feature=related

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAdam

Gloumdalclitch,

"Naqdi, a genius cetainly destined for posterity… !" That's right everyone knows how desperate the Greenies are for "martyrs". I would not be surprised if the Greenies are planning to "create" their own "martyrs".

What Naqdi is certainly destined for is to be the head of the Guards. Probably at about the same time everyone starts talking about the new President Jafari.

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSamuel

Who knows who will be President next, but even if Khamenei stays in power it will be sooner than you think. Once propaganda bafoons like Ahmadinejad, Mohammad Marandi, and you have outlived their usefulness, their fate will be worse than that of the protesters. Evil dictators are most cruel to those who are most loyal to them.

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterAdam

Samual

"Probably at about the same time everyone starts talking about the new President Jafari."

Are you predicting that Ahmadinejad will fall on his sword sometime soon??

If Jafari is to replace Ahmadinejad, who will replace the "Supreme Leader" (assuming of course that Khamenie is mortal). Or perhaps, that phase of Iran's Islamic Revolution may come to an end then - to be replaced by a version of the North Korean model. Interesting story here http://www.smh.com.au/world/north-korean-army-cashes-in-on-exports-to-china-20091108-i3ku.html about how the North Korean Army is looking after itself - there seems to be hints there of where the IRGC is headed (total command of the State?).

Barry

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBarry Ward

Barry Ward,

"Are you predicting that Ahmadinejad will fall on his sword sometime soon??"

Not at all, AN will have his two full terms just like Khatami and Raf.

It is hardly surprising that the North Korean Army has come to dominate the state given the fact that to this day they are still facing American troops on the Korean peninsula. The more interesting question is why the Americans are still there in what is a purely national conflict two decades after the end of the cold war. Imperialism is a difficult bad habit to break I guess, worse than smoking.

Fortunately the resistance in Iraq and Afghanistan is gently helping the Americans break that bad habit one bullet at a time.

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSamuel

Samual

It is true that the North Korean Army still faces an American Army based in South Korea. There are long and complex historical reasons for this situation.

BUT - this does not mean that North Korea should have enslaved their own people as they have done. Once again, your unabashed hatred of the US blinds you and you cannot see clearly. If you can find any vestige of virtue in the North Korean State, then your soul is truly lost. Self interest and fanatical allegiance to a distorted ideology is what directs the North Korean regime - very similar to what has occurred in Iran since 1979. I will admit however, that the North Korean situation is more extreme than that in Iran, but that is where Iran is heading. Fortunately, Iranians are a more sophisticated race of people than the North Koreans are - and they will not allow themselves to be subjugated to the same degree.

Barry

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBarry Ward

To Samuel
"Everyone knows how desperate the Greenies are for martyrs". Who's "everyone"? Those paranoïd military cops, you hold in high esteem ? Greens don't need more martyrs, your friends provided with enough of them. "Holy regime" Jafari, Jumbo Firouzabadi & co. are nothing more than crooked cops, they think like crooked cops and act like crooked
cops. While filling their pockets with public money, they tell the iranian people: you are stupid and if you don't agree and protest we're gonna hit you on the head with our club, our lone and ultimate argument, And beware, because God gaves us his blessing!
(Naqdi, the master strategist. LOL!)

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGloumdalclitch

Samuel,

In a number of your posts you have defended what most would call totalitarian regimes. I understand to a point but do you trully support a regime that does not rule by the power of the people? What right do leaders in China, North Korea, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Myanmar, and Iran have to oppress their people because they may engage in disent? It would seem like the Prof Crocodile that these leaders just view their people as sheep that don't know any better. I am not asking for a debate on western democracy but why you think these regimes have a right to do what they do? Please keep in mind I understand your not a fan of some of these states but your tone suggests some understanding an apprreciation of their tactics. Why?

Thx
Bill

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterBill Davit

To Samuel
You say : "Everyone starts talking about the new President Jafari" Those "everyone" again? You seem to mistake "Everyone" for this little clique of IRCG profiteers in uniform who award each others novelty medals for their heroïc conduct again "soft threats"

November 9, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterGloumdalclitch

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>