UPDATE 1555 GMT: Karroubi Clarifies, Repeats, Challenges. From The Flying Carpet Institute, via the Facebook site linked to Mir Hossein Mousavi and Saham News:
Mehdi Karoubi, in a meeting with a group of prominent political figures including some of the leaders of reformist parties said:

“Although today they have shut down newspapers, filtered websites, imprisoned many of our dear friends, closed down the office of [reformist] parties including the Etemade Melli office and even my personal office, although they fired shots at my car, although some are threatening everyday and are insulting Mir Hossein Mousavi, me and the great nation of Iran in every way possible and take our words out of content, but I am firmly announcing that I never compromise over people’s rights and one of the main rights of this nation is their votes that they casted in the ballot boxes while trusting the authorities; and I will be with the people till the very end and will try for holding free elections and eliminating current obstacles.”

“I will announce my detailed views regarding the principles of the Islamic Revolution, defending people’s rights and the necessity for holding free elections to the noble nation of Iran soon.”

UPDATE 0900 GMT: Persian2English has published a translation of the Karroubi “clarification” carried on Rah-e-Sabz last night. This was one of the key pieces of evidence behind our analysis, as the Karroubi camp deliberately “fed” this information to a trusted reporter to ensure the widest dissemination:

“It was reported by Fars News, Iran’s official news agency, that Mehdi Karoubi has officially recognized the status of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Mr. Mojtaba Vahedi, advisor for Mehdi Karoubi responded to such claims. Talking to a JARAS reporter, he said: “I talked to Mr. Karoubi and he claims that Mr. Abu-Torabi has uttered some words that are not true.”

According to the advisor, Mr. Karoubi talked in detail about the rigged election. Following his speech, Karoubi explained, “A few reporters gathered around and asked a few questions. I told them that the government has been sworn in and has the responsibility to respond to the people’s needs. In the same interview I stressed that there has been a rigging in the election and I stand by my words. I am not so whimsy to retreat because of insults and threats. But people have daily needs that the residing government needs to respond to. I also told an English paper that they can rest assured that Ahmadinejad’s government will not last four years.”

Karoubi’s last words were: “My words are the words of the nation: where is our vote?”


EA staff had a conference late last night to go over all the information we have — from websites and sources inside Iran — on Mehdi Karroubi’s statement, reflecting on the Presidential election and his acceptance of Mr Ahmadinejad as the “head of the government of the regime” because it had been decreed by “Mr Khamenei”.

We are watching for further developments today and may revise our analysis, however, for now, here is our reading:

Iran Snap Analysis: The Karroubi and Khatami Manoeuvres
The Latest from Iran (26 January): Now for the Follow-Up….
The Latest from Iran (25 January): Who Makes A Move Today?

1. KARROUBI HAS TAKEN A STAND AGAINST THE “PRESIDENT” AND THE SUPREME LEADER

We are treating the statement put out on Karroubi’s website, Saham News, as the cleric’s primary line. (We note the interviews given by Hossein Karroubi to a series of reporters, including Radio Farda, BBC Persian, and Associated Press, but there are ambiguities and some confusion in how those interviews are being written up.) This is the key line:

Due to the fact that Mr Khamenei has ‘confirmed/given legal validity to the decree which stated that Ahmadinejad has been elected, for this reason, I consider him [Mr Ahmadinejad] to be the ‘head of the government of this regime’.

Ahmadinejad is not the President and holds his position not by the will of the voters but the pronouncement of Ayatollah Khamenei. He thus does not have legitimacy. (The most important follow-up to the Saham News statement is a story fed to Rah-e-Sabz, in which Karroubi repeated that he stood with the people and said he did not expect Ahmadinejad to last four years.)

And it’s not the Supreme Leader but “Mr Khamenei”. That is not a slip, because the statement has been unchanged on Saham News for hours. And that is not respect but an insult.

2. DID KARROUBI INTEND TO TAKE THIS STAND?

This is still not clear, given the chain of events. The confusing series of events started when Karroubi spoke with a group of reporters Monday morning. What he did not anticipate was that Fars News, having asked the question whether Karroubi accepted that the June Presidential election was legal, printed his answer as a recognition of Ahmadinejad as “the President”. So, in one sense, Hossein Karroubi’s series of interviews throughout the day and even the Saham News statement were “damage control”, protecting his father against charges that he had sold out to the regime.

“Damage control”, however, did not require that Karroubi take his political shots at Mr Khamenei and “the head of the government of the regime”. So whether or not the cleric started the morning with a plan for a fight or whether he was bumped into it by the Fars episode, the outcome is the same.

3. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CHALLENGE OF THE “ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN”.

My first attempt at analysis connected the Karroubi manoeuvre with the initiative by Ali Larijani-Mohsen Rezaei-Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf to curb or even topple Ahmadinejad. Just forget I wrote that — I was wrong.

4. BUT THIS DOES DISTANCE KARROUBI FROM KHATAMI

The interesting sub-plot today has been obvious “clear blue water” between Mehdi Karroubi and Mohammad Khatami. As Saham News was putting out the right line on Karroubi v. Khamenei/Ahmadinejad this afternoon, it was also taking shots at former President Khatami. In particular, Saham News was playing up the story — which has not been confirmed — that Khatami had sent a letter to the Supreme Leader seeking reconcilation. What’s more, Saham was pressing the point that Khatami had “recognised” the current Government, thus distinguishing his position from that of Karroubi.

Why the divergence? Well, that’s a story to be considered over following days. But let’s be clear: Mehdi Karroubi is out front on this political challenge.

5. AND MOUSAVI?

But is Karroubi also far ahead of Mir Hossein Mousavi? So far Mousavi has been silent on the day’s events, apart from his website Kalemeh reprinting the Saham News statement.

6. COULD EVERYTHING CHANGE?

As we broke up the meeting tonight, an EA correspondent said, “You know, Karroubi may well have another statement out when we wake up in the morning.” Indeed, he could, even to the point of issuing another clarification that withdraws/modifies his “Mr Khamenei” position.

But, at the least, we can’t see Karroubi withdrawing his now sustained condemnation — sometimes explicit, sometimes in a bit of coding, as today — of President Ahmadinejad. At most, he separates Mr Khamenei from his criticism.

So pull back all those headlines that came out earlier today (and are still in some “Western” publications). This is not recognition of the President. This is, to adopt a US term, “dis-respecting”.

It’s not a question of if, but how far, Karroubi wants to push it.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
33 Responses to “UPDATED Iran Special Analysis: What Karroubi’s Statement on “Mr Khamenei”/”Head of Government” Means”
  1. kim says:

    A comment on the issue of Ayatollah vs. Mr used to refer to Khamenei.

    In Iran, Mr. Khamenei is commonly used to refer to the Supreme Leader and is not offensive in nature. Generally, he is called Mr. Khamenei, not always Ayatollah.

  2. Mr. Azadi says:

    unlike what Kim is saying, I can assure you that in the Islamic Republic internal politics, The supreme leader is never called “Ayatollah Khamenei” let alone “Mr. Khamenei”, specially when it comes to formal conversations.
    The supreme leader is always referred as “The Supreme leader” (in Farsi: Maghame Mo’azzam Rahbari), calling him “Ayatollah” or “Mr.” not only is not polite, but it is kind of insulting and it might mean that you do not consider him as the “leader” if you do not call him “Supreme Leader”.
    Exactly like Imam Khomeini (the founder of the revolution), he never used to be called Mr. Khomeini.

  3. Megan says:

    Mr. Azadi,

    I believe (and I may be wrong) Kim was referring to the Farsi word “Agha” which means “Mr.” in English.

  4. jimbo says:

    mr azadi is very right. publicly khamenie is never refered to other than ’supreme leader’ .
    kim is very wrong.
    megan comment is quite ambigiuos and confusing but wrong as well.

    but anyway how karubi reffered to khamenie is kinda irrelevent. his expressed opinion is more important.

  5. Megan says:

    Jimbo,

    What is ambigious abot what I said?

  6. jimbo says:

    ‘agha’ and ‘mr’ . i just dont get it. i think the topic here was that karubi reffered to khamenie as mr (which of course is agha in farsi). so i dont know am i missing something here. of course karubi speaking farsi says aghaye khamenei, but usually nobody referes to that pig as ‘agha’ but ‘rahbar’

  7. Bosco says:

    He should have just referred to him as haji agha.

  8. Me personally I always just call him Ole Shifty-eyes. Always looks like he’s looking over his shoulders…probably to see if the snakes are showing!

  9. Megan says:

    Jimbo,

    The fact that you “ just do not get it” is an understatement. I was on topic. I was trying to offer a possible explanation for what Kim might have meant. I stated a fact that Mr. is one translation for Agha. Others are gentlemen and Sir. Please watch you words before you characterize other people comments. There was nothing “ambiguous” about Agha=Mr.

    And please do not say; “but usually nobody refers to that pig as ‘agha’ but ‘rahbar’ . Because you are very wrong. All thugs call him Agha. Read this news clip in which M. Khatami calls him Agha. http://sahamnews.org/?p=551

    If you ask me he is a pathetic Common Criminal and SL stands for Supreme Loony. And I spell his last name as Khannei.

  10. Josh and Joanne says:

    (not in the mood for politics right now but…)

    That picture prompted the Obi-wan Karroubi name.

    J/J

  11. Peace Maker says:

    Jimbo,

    I think You and Mr. Azadi are quite right .
    Referring to someone as “Agha” , alone ( no name attached) ,
    is equivalent to calling him “master” or “head of the family ” .
    But when one says agha-”ye” Kamenei (adding a name )
    It is like saying Mr. Tom ,Dick or Harry ,….. and so it is in this “ordinary” way that
    (as J/J puts ) Obi-wan Karoubi has regarded Khamenei in his declaration.

  12. [...] vielleicht gar nicht. Und bedeutet gar das Gegenteil. Eine interessante differenzierte Deutung bei enduring america. Veröffentlicht in Hintergrund. Schlagwörter: Iran, Karrubi, Propaganda. Kommentar [...]

  13. Peace Maker, I think I get it, like we have the English phrase “The Man”. If you were to say The Man when you were talking about Obama without using his name, it would be a compliment, but if you said “the man Obama” it would be a way to point out that he’s just another man.

  14. Well actually “The Man” isn’t always a compliment, I forgot it can also be a euphemism for The Establishment or those in power trying to maintain the status quo.

  15. Greeny says:

    It is looking like Karoubi made a mistake in speaking to the Fars News reporter yesterday. It seems not to have been an interview (unline what Fars says) but Karoubi was asked a question in passing on the fringes of the Mardonsalari Party congress. He seems to have answered a question the reporter had asked him whether he (paraphrasing) “accepted the legitimacy of the popularly elected president” (this is basically how reporters in IRI interview people; they make a statement which is pro-SL and ask the “interviewee” to confirm it. There could be severe consequences if you don’t confirm the statement).

    Karoubi and the people around him seem to be trying to clear up the mess now.

    The Jaras report about Ali Larijani’s son being arrested on Ashura and details about Khatami’s letter to SL may be part of this cleaning up process, where they throw a couple of punches at SL & co to remind that they can hit back.

    PS. I am thinking the “Mr. Khamanei” thing was either a slip of the tongue or a deliberate reporting “error” by Saham News (again as part of the hitting back process). In interviews with BBC, Radio Farda, etc Karoubi Jr did not repeat the “Kr Khamenei” thing, referring to SL as “rahbari” (leader) or “magham-e rahbari”

  16. Hossein says:

    The remark about snakes on his shoulders is the best.

  17. [...] Iranian activists began denouncing him on blogs and social networking websites as a traitor, and parsing remarks attributed to him by his son for other meanings, yada, yada, [...]

  18. [...] this was meant as a tacit jab to Ayatollah Khamenei’s own authority. Some report that Karroubi’s use of “Mr. Khamenei” referral was not an accidental slip [...]

  19. Arshama says:

    Reuters has picked up today’s clarifications posted on Saham News: “Iran’s Karoubi says still wants new elections” http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE60P2MU.htm

  20. Heidar says:

    There is a video clip of the “interview” Karroubi did with Fars News at homylafayette’s blog: http://homylafayette.blogspot.com/2010/01/karroubi-softens-stance-desperate.html

  21. Greeny says:

    Heidar,

    Thanks for the link to the Karoubi “interview” with Fars.

    The video clip is quite interesting. Here is the link it on You Tube (taken from the link you posted):
    http://enduringamerica.com/2010/01/26/the-latest-from-iran-26-january-now-for-the-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-24373

    The text in the blog post says that in response to the question from the Fars “reporter” (apparently a repeat question), Karoubi nods. I didn’t see a nod. He just kisses the guy on the forehead, in what looks like a condescending way. Does anyone else see him nodding?

    Also, is Fars News basing report of its interview with Karoubi on this exchange (if you can call it that)?! Surely, they can’t be that desperate yet.

  22. jimbo says:

    megan now i can say you are wrong and confused.
    peacemaker comments are absaloutly correct and offer a better explanation to the topic we are discussing. i think it sums it up perfectly.
    josh&joanna, like that ‘obi one karubi’ remark. very funny. and i guess we all know who darth vader is.

  23. Mehdi Karoubi condemns rigged election and violence on people one more time!

  24. rezvan says:

    A lot of kerfuffle about nothing. Can anyone remind us whether Karroubi or Mousavi ever filed a complaint outlining how they believe the election was rigged. A University of Maryland opinion poll in Sep’09 confirmed that if the elections were held today the majority would vote for AN. All hard available evidence including pre-election polls said clearly that AN would win. Moreover a clear majority like the current political system so no hope for those who wanted backed with US $ for the Islamic Republic to self destruct & become secular. Long live the Islamic Republic.

  25. Hossein says:

    The “U of MD” pole was erroneous and there are numerous scientific accounts of its blatant flaws. It was a paid-for poll and the university really had nothing to do with it. Just read the correct analysis. Genuine experts in statistics who are also free have reported that the election was rigged and have pointed out to a number of even simplistic attempts in producing numbers. One simple point that has stuck in my mind is that the differential among the candidates as a function did not in any way demonstrate regional and other specific attributes. Another example from among many: The towns people of Karrubi’s birth, for example, must have all either passed away, changed all at once (a statistical impossibility thus indicative of manipulation), or were never there. Do nor undermine the expertise of the Iranian people who looked at the rigged numbers and saw clearly that they were fabricated. PERIOD. I hope the regime that rapes and kills its own citizens and lies all the time and has pilfered our national wealth and has squandered it on others and has made a few thugs very very wealthy will indeed go away soon. The Iranian people are smart and have now fully awakened and will no longer believe the lies of the IRI nor of its agents. PERIOD.

  26. Bosco says:

    Rezvan is not Iranian, so he really doesn’t care about what happens to the people. He just cares that the IRI opposes the US, UK and Israel, and sends welfare checks to Hamas and Hezbollah.

  27. Hossein says:

    Shame on people who see the atrocities and do nothing, say nothing and don’t care. Shame on those like Rezvan who are not Iranian, but you are human are you not. Do you not care when a fellow human is tortured to death. Shame! You are so blinded by your hatred of the West that when an innocent Iranian is tortured to death because of daring to seek justice and freedom that you ignore it. Please take a closer look at your your own conscience. Ponder Iqbal’s poetry when he talks of human dignity, do you not care. Do look into your own conscience.

    Shame, too, on those Iranians who see the horrible conduct and see what the IRI is doing to the citizens, yet is oblivious and doesn’t care, or worse sides with the rapists. Shame!

  28. Bill says:

    Rezvan,

    You really must be a paid basiji! Did you forget to read the fine print in the University of Maryland poll—27% would not respond!!!! Statistically speaking that invalidates the poll and the organization running the poll all but said that. Not one election in the West that was polled has ever reported a number so high that did not respond! Secondly I would hedge a bet many people said Ahmandinejad simply because they were afraid. Gee now why would they be afraid? Could it be the arbitray arrests, beatings, rapes, and killings? News flash it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what the results of that poll would be.

    Do you really think we in the West and your fellow Iranians cannot read? I guess we know why Totalitarian regimes are so stupid, they never listen to their people.

    Thx
    Bill

  29. Megan says:

    Jimbo,

    Neither you nor Peace Maker understood my objection to your remarks. I hope this make it clear.

    I was not debating the proper or the improper way of addressing the jerk Khamenei. I was objecting to your use of word “ambiguous “in characterize the dictionary translation of Mr. = Agha I had offered. There was absolutely nothing ambiguous about that translation and it is sad you do not want to see that.

  30. jimbo says:

    rezvan -you are a blind stupidbasiji. just to say since when a university poll is a confirmation of votes? and you use the term ‘islamic repulic’. this regime is nor islamic and neither a republic. open your eyes and stop writing bs in the hope of anyone agreeing with your views, nobody will.

  31. Megan says:

    Jinbo,

    I agree with you regarding Rezvan.

    Rezvan,

    Hey Mr. Cyber Basiji, on hand you do your usual rant that U.S. is up to no good and on the other you back your claim by using poll by a University in the U.S.?

    Your rant is hilarious. You want independence for Iran and you fail to see that your master, Islamic Republic, has not brought independence to Iran it has only replaced U.S. with Russia and China.

  32.  

Creative Commons License
Enduring America is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available by contacting us at http://enduringamerica.com/contact.