As Afghanistan votes today, a tangled but essential view of the politics in Washington is offered through an article by Helene Cooper, David Sanger, and Thom Shanker in The New York Times, as all sides in the bureaucratic fight try to get the reporters in their corner.
EA WorldView has noted since Obama's first week in the White House how the US military --- and in particular General David Petraeus, the US commander in Afghanistan --- has tried to impose its view of escalation on a President who was supposedly "cautious" about ramped-up American involvement.
Well, this latest round is rather muddled, at least in Cooper/Sanger/Shanker's blow-by-blow narrative. However, if you strip away the mantras about the White House's deliberations and worries about the outcome of the strategy, the winner emerges:
It's Petraeus.
When President Obama descended into the White House Situation Room on Monday for his monthly update on Afghanistan and Pakistan, the new top American military commander, Gen.David H. Petraeus, ticked off signs of progress.
Come December, when the president intends to assess his Afghan strategy, he will be able to claim tangible successes, General Petraeus predicted by secure video hookup from Kabul, according to administration officials.
Click to read more ...