"Bring Fatah into Gaza": The Call to Arms in the Washington Post

Well, you can't accuse the schemers of being subtle. In today's Washington Post, two former Bush Administration officials and a retired general set out the master plan:

When the dust settles in Gaza...American efforts must focus on strengthening the capabilities of the Palestinian party upon whom hope for peace can rest, the Palestinian Authority, and ensuring the stability of the West Bank....American efforts can forge a basis for security between Israelis and Palestinians by developing a professional Palestinian security system that would help inhibit Hamas in the West Bank and eventually allow the PA to reestablish its authority in Gaza.


The authors --- one of whom (Slocombe) was responsible for the disastrous order to disband the Iraqi security forces in June 2003, one of whom (Crouch) was in the midst of the disastrous US policy towards Iraq from 2005 to 2007 --- argue, "The United States already has a framework for supporting this process through the Office of the U.S. Security Coordinator (USSC), headed by Lt. Gen. Keith Dayton." Here's the bit of history that they forget to mention:

In November 2006, Dayton met Dahlan for the first of a long series of talks in Jerusalem and Ramallah. Both men were accompanied by aides. From the outset, says an official who took notes at the meeting, Dayton was pushing two overlapping agendas.

“We need to reform the Palestinian security apparatus,” Dayton said, according to the notes. “But we also need to build up your forces in order to take on Hamas.”

Dahlan replied that, in the long run, Hamas could be defeated only by political means. “But if I am going to confront them,” he added, “I need substantial resources. As things stand, we do not have the capability.”

The US tried to give Dahlan and the Palestinian Authority that capability, only to come unstuck when Hamas won the running battles against Fatah in mid-2007. Eighteen months later, the Israeli attack on Gaza is an opportunity at a do-over of that plan.

Crouch, Slocombe, and Meigs note, of course, that the current Palestinian security force has been put forward in Jenin and Hebron "enforcing order in previously lawless cities", calling for expansion of funding and equipment for the effort. Then they, rather clumsily, shift to Gaza: since an international monitoring force in southern Gaza will not work, "empowering Palestinians to assume security responsibility and continued measures to enhance the Palestinians' ability to keep their side of an agreement should be America's principal contribution to the peace process in the coming months".

Given these folks' track record in Iraq, I am not trembling at the prospect of their success this time. The tragic part is that schemes like this, standing in the way of a cease-fire, are the reason why more Gazans are dying each day.