US Politics: Why is Obama's Popularity Dipping?

In the Sunday Times of London this week, Christina Lamb observed that whilst Barack Obama is one of the most successful presidents in terms of passing legislation, his popularity has sunk to a new low.

A CBS/New York Times poll gives Obama an approval rating of 44%. Richard Nixon and George W Bush had ratings which were significantly lower, in the 20% range at their. The warning light for Obama is that, 18 months into their Presidencies, the approval ratings for Nixon and Bush were 58% and 62%.

The Obama Administration’s legislative record is the best since Franklin D Roosevelt’s. It has passed an economic stimulus package of almost $800 billion and has made an important start to health care legislation, although there will be challenges to the latter in the courts. The Finance Reform Bill, signed into law this week, will be the most significant finance regulatory package since the 1930s and undoes much of Ronald Reagan’s deregulation. After a slow reaction to the Louisiana oil rig disaster, Obama has shown leadership in bringing BP to the table and shaking out a huge compensation package. One would have expected the public to have some respect for these achievements.

So why are Obama’s ratings low? Recovery from the economic recession is slow and patchy. Unemployment at almost 10% remains high and is unlikely to improve for a while. Unsurprisingly, then, the President’s popularity suffers. Obama’s problem from Day One was that that the expectation bar was set so high in a shaky economy that no one could have cleared it.

There are other factor. Historically, it is not unusual for a Chief Executive to suffer as he approaches his first mid-term elections. Bill Clinton lost control of Congress in 1994 and had to contend with Republican Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, who ran away with the idea that he was now in charge of the government. Odd notion, but the Republicans did shut down the Federal Government twice in Clinton’s time.

The media's criticisms have an impact. The unreconstructed neo-conservative, Charles Krauthammer, is crowing in The Washington Post that “there is a run on Obama shares”. (For perspective, consider that Krauthammer slammed George W. Bush in 2001 slammed “W” for declaring a regime-change war on Iraq and not the real enemy of democracy, Iran.) Other far-from-conservative newspapers, such as The New York Times, are claiming that Obama is losing with the voters. Media observations cross the political aisle.

In a politically divided country, Obama is bound to be unpopular in Republican strongholds and with Republican voters. He is not the only one suffering from tensions: in 2010, some middle-of-the-road Republicans are having problems with Tea Party candidates. It is now a dog-eat-dog political world in the USA.

Obama’s win in 2008 found many Democrats winning Congressional seats that be difficult to hold two years later, given that these seats are Republican in all but name. However, what is surprising is that Robert Gibbs, Obama’s press secretary, has expressed publicly that Democrats might lose control of both Houses of Congress. Sitting Democrats have blamed Obama for this message and he is now viewed by some as an electoral liability. The President's coattails, for some in his party, are getting short.

Beyond all this, Perhaps the truth lies in the oddity that --- apart from the Clinton years, and perhaps not even then --- Democrats are not used to holding the Executive Branch. Perhaps they are uncomfortable with power. Whatever the reason, the Democrats are starting to take their of the 70s and 80s when they were a firing squad……standing in a circle.