Saturday
Jun122010
World Cup Fever: When the US Beat England (Haddigan)
Saturday, June 12, 2010 at 0:01
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYFl6oOad3E [/youtube]
As perhaps more than a few of you may have noted, the World Cup ("soccer" if you're in the US; "football" if you're in the rest of the world) opened yesterday in South Africa with a 1-1 draw between the hosts and Mexico.
Here in Britain --- or in the "England" part of Britain --- even the excitement of the first World Cup in Africa is secondary to the near-novelty of an English match with their former colony, the United States. Thoughts of a special relationship have gone out the window, and --- on a personal note --- there's been 15 seconds of media infamy. Local broadcasters and press have been at EA's door because of an American who supports England and his two half-English, half-American children who back the US.
It's a near-novelty because the two countries have met before in a World Cup match. Lee Haddigan takes us back to 1950:
Sixty years ago the England football team wore blue shirts for the first and only time.
They were participating in their first World Cup. The English had declined to enter the first three tournaments, from 1930 to 1938, as England didn’t need a competition to consider themselves World Champions. It was England’s game and their gift to the world; the World Cup was little more than a means of finding out who was the second-best team in the world.
England was only persuaded to enter the 1950 World Cup in Brazil as a sign of international cooperation in the new Cold War era. And, after a 2-0 victory against Chile in their first game, England approached their next match full of their usual self-assurance. The manager rested Stanley Matthews, a figure comparable to America's Babe Ruth in English sports folklore, but otherwise fielded a star-studded team. Billy Wright, Tom Finney, Stan Mortensen played that day, all legends of the English game, and all in those blue shirts.
England ran out onto to the pitch at Belo Horizonte to face a team of American part-timers --- no-hopers --- who had lost a warm up game 9-0 to Italy. Ninety minutes they trudged off, defeated by "the shot heard around the world" as the USA team were carried off by 20000 cheering Brazilians.
In the world of sporting shocks, nothing comes bigger than the USA 1-0 victory over England in the 1950 World Cup.
Before the game the bookies were offering the odds of 500-1 for a USA win: bet $1 and you would have won $500. It was such an unlikely outcome not even the wildest gambler, armed with inside information and a crystal ball, would have made it. But it happened, thanks to a pass after 37 minutes from a student accountant, Walter Bahr, headed into the net by Joe Gaetjens, a part-time dishwasher and meatpacker from Haiti and to the goalkeeping of Frank Borghi, a funeral director and D-Day veteran, who saved shot after shot in the second half as England piled on pressure.
The result was met with disbelief and disgust from Newcastle to London. Some papers ran the story with a black border round the page, a layout usually only employed with the death of a member of the Royal Family. Even the staid Times of London reported the result as a "sensation’.
By contrast, the result excited little interest in the US. The team returned to no fanfare or acclaim, never to play together again, their result unacknowledged until the 1994 World Cup in America.
By that time it was too late for Joe Gaetjens to receive the recognition he deserved for "the shot heard around the world". He did not play for America after that World Cup, and went back to Haiti to run his own business. In 1964, he disappeared, never to be heard of again, an apparently innocent victim of Haitian leader Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier’s secret police.
The bookies are not offering 500-1 against the US this Saturday. They rate the US as a 13-2 shot ($1 wins $6.50), with 11-1 to repeat a 1-0 victory.
After the supposed certainty of 1950, only two things are certain in 2010. First, England fans are not as confident this time about an easy England win.
But more importantly, and you could get a million against one from a bookie on this, England will not be playing in blue shirts.
As perhaps more than a few of you may have noted, the World Cup ("soccer" if you're in the US; "football" if you're in the rest of the world) opened yesterday in South Africa with a 1-1 draw between the hosts and Mexico.
Here in Britain --- or in the "England" part of Britain --- even the excitement of the first World Cup in Africa is secondary to the near-novelty of an English match with their former colony, the United States. Thoughts of a special relationship have gone out the window, and --- on a personal note --- there's been 15 seconds of media infamy. Local broadcasters and press have been at EA's door because of an American who supports England and his two half-English, half-American children who back the US.
It's a near-novelty because the two countries have met before in a World Cup match. Lee Haddigan takes us back to 1950:
Sixty years ago the England football team wore blue shirts for the first and only time.
They were participating in their first World Cup. The English had declined to enter the first three tournaments, from 1930 to 1938, as England didn’t need a competition to consider themselves World Champions. It was England’s game and their gift to the world; the World Cup was little more than a means of finding out who was the second-best team in the world.
England was only persuaded to enter the 1950 World Cup in Brazil as a sign of international cooperation in the new Cold War era. And, after a 2-0 victory against Chile in their first game, England approached their next match full of their usual self-assurance. The manager rested Stanley Matthews, a figure comparable to America's Babe Ruth in English sports folklore, but otherwise fielded a star-studded team. Billy Wright, Tom Finney, Stan Mortensen played that day, all legends of the English game, and all in those blue shirts.
England ran out onto to the pitch at Belo Horizonte to face a team of American part-timers --- no-hopers --- who had lost a warm up game 9-0 to Italy. Ninety minutes they trudged off, defeated by "the shot heard around the world" as the USA team were carried off by 20000 cheering Brazilians.
In the world of sporting shocks, nothing comes bigger than the USA 1-0 victory over England in the 1950 World Cup.
Before the game the bookies were offering the odds of 500-1 for a USA win: bet $1 and you would have won $500. It was such an unlikely outcome not even the wildest gambler, armed with inside information and a crystal ball, would have made it. But it happened, thanks to a pass after 37 minutes from a student accountant, Walter Bahr, headed into the net by Joe Gaetjens, a part-time dishwasher and meatpacker from Haiti and to the goalkeeping of Frank Borghi, a funeral director and D-Day veteran, who saved shot after shot in the second half as England piled on pressure.
The result was met with disbelief and disgust from Newcastle to London. Some papers ran the story with a black border round the page, a layout usually only employed with the death of a member of the Royal Family. Even the staid Times of London reported the result as a "sensation’.
By contrast, the result excited little interest in the US. The team returned to no fanfare or acclaim, never to play together again, their result unacknowledged until the 1994 World Cup in America.
By that time it was too late for Joe Gaetjens to receive the recognition he deserved for "the shot heard around the world". He did not play for America after that World Cup, and went back to Haiti to run his own business. In 1964, he disappeared, never to be heard of again, an apparently innocent victim of Haitian leader Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier’s secret police.
The bookies are not offering 500-1 against the US this Saturday. They rate the US as a 13-2 shot ($1 wins $6.50), with 11-1 to repeat a 1-0 victory.
After the supposed certainty of 1950, only two things are certain in 2010. First, England fans are not as confident this time about an easy England win.
But more importantly, and you could get a million against one from a bookie on this, England will not be playing in blue shirts.
tagged Lee Haddigan, World Cup, football in Music & Culture, UK & Ireland
Lee Haddigan, World Cup, football in Music & Culture, UK & Ireland
Reader Comments (9)
Scott,
Tut tut... Traitor ;-)
For the sake of peace in the family I hope for a win-win situation...
Arshama
Well, serves them right for wearing Scottish colours. I'm sure north of the border they might have enjoyed it. I say it beats the Miracle on Ice. Hockey fans might disagree, though.
By the way, go USA and Deutschland! [I'm also a Team Melli and Tartan Army guy]
P.S. 'Soccer' is also used in a few other Dominion countries, but I'm just being a smart-ass. ;-)
"England didn’t need a competition to consider themselves World Champions. It was England’s game and their gift to the world; the World Cup was little more than a means of finding out who was the second-best team in the world."
This may just be the embittered Celt in me speaking, but isn't this still the case today? :)
Quite right Mike, though we have no problems (just) with the Brazilians making the same claim ;) here is a link to a http://philly.com" rel="nofollow">philly.com report showing the prematch celebrations. Thankfully, no hooliganism (as yet) from the fans. perhaps this could be the beginning of a new 'grassroots' special relationship!? For the record, I predict 2-1 to England and have had a bet on that result.
http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/Game_of_the__.html#axzz0qf13f9Mh" rel="nofollow">http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/Game_of_the...
Not a spectacular performance from our USA team but a competent one. Go USA.
Lee,
Sorry (not really) losing your bet.
Megan,
Shame on you. Your team managed to stop the favoured Brits and scored a draw, afarin. No regret for Scott neither ;-)
Allez les Bleus :-)
Arshama
Arshama,
All and all this was a good day in my book. My homeland scored 1-0 against Islamic Republic and its burly thug defenders and my adopted home scored 1-1 against its kissing cousins, the Brits. I am proud of both. I just wish my team in Iran all would have gone home safe and sound. But I know in my heart some did not and many families are in stress right now. I wish there was something we could do besides expressing our love and support for them through cyber space.
Here is the song of Marg or Azadi which I heard for the first time last Thursday; it is very telling. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NR0mLyhaeI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NR0mLyhaeI
There is no emoticon for talking through gritted teeth (is there?) so all I can say is well done to the US team for playing a good game. There must be something about blue shirts always bringing a good result for the US!
The good news is both teams are now favorites to qualify from the group and play in the knockout stages.
And Megan, at odds of 7-1 I got some good entertainment for my 10 pounds. Especially as we should have won 2-1, at least!
Looking Beyond England...
I found your entry interesting thus I've added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)...