Saturday
Mar142009
Did the US Avert a Coup in Pakistan? No.
Saturday, March 14, 2009 at 8:03
And now an enlightening tale of the Internet and how to substitute an exaggeration for the real story:
This morning there are stories flying around the Web that Admiral Mike Mullen, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, may have stopped a military coup in Pakistan through a series of phone call to General Ashfaq Pervez Kiani, through a series of phone calls.
It is being reported by more reliable sources like Al Jazeera that Kiani and President Asif Ali Zardari have clashed in the last 24 hours, but Mullen didn't intervene to stop a military takeover. Here's how the rumour, and distortion, started.
On Thursday night, Mullen was interviewed by Charlie Rose of the US Public Broadcasting System. Here's the video and transcript of the key exchange in the discussion:
This is straightforward: those pushing the "coup" question have turned Mullen's 10 exchanges with Kiani over the last year, which include recent meetings in Washington and Kabul, into 10 phone calls from Mullen to Kiani in recent days. Those discussions were on broader military matters, notably the handling of the insurgency in the Northwest Frontier Provinces.
The US Government does not want a coup in the middle of this crisis. If Washington thinks Zardari is too damaging to stay in power, then it will look for his replacement, but at a quieter time and a less dramatic process.
If those jumping to coup conclusions had listened to the next section of Mullen's interview, they would have gotten to the real heart of the story:
There you have it. As Josh Mull has noted on this site, the Obama Administration wants to keep the Pakistani military focused on the "sanctuary" in the northwest and wants the Pakistani Government firmly behind Pakistani, US, and joint operations there. There should be no conflict with India distracting from that effort.
And --- here is the point of the US policy towards the Long March --- there should be no distraction of domestic politics from that overriding objective. So Washington's efforts over the last few days have been not to topple Zardari but to get the President to back off from a showdown with political rivals like Nawaz Sharif and to be careful in his handling of the lawyers' movement.
If Zardari continues to see political and judicial opponents as Public Enemies Number One, and thus loses the plot on the approach to the "real" insurgency, then he may have to go.
But not now.
This morning there are stories flying around the Web that Admiral Mike Mullen, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, may have stopped a military coup in Pakistan through a series of phone call to General Ashfaq Pervez Kiani, through a series of phone calls.
It is being reported by more reliable sources like Al Jazeera that Kiani and President Asif Ali Zardari have clashed in the last 24 hours, but Mullen didn't intervene to stop a military takeover. Here's how the rumour, and distortion, started.
On Thursday night, Mullen was interviewed by Charlie Rose of the US Public Broadcasting System. Here's the video and transcript of the key exchange in the discussion:
CHARLIE ROSE: But you see reports today of increasing strife between Zardari, the leader of Pakistan, and his opposition, worrying some people that it might become Musharraf all over again.
MICHAEL MULLEN: Sure. We’re watching -- obviously watching this lawyers march very carefully. And I’ve been engaged from the standpoint of understanding what’s going on there, and I know that there are people are concerned that this could degenerate into a situation that could very possibly generate a crisis, which may cause actions to be taken on the part of the military.
I don’t think that possibility is out there as a high probability right now, but certainly it’s a concern. And I’ve interacted with my counterpart in Pakistan upwards of 10 times. I mean, I’ve been with him
upwards of 10 times over the last year, and he is committed to a civilian government. He’s committed to the democracy that’s there. In my view, the last thing in the world he wants to do is become -- is take over as President Musharraf did.
CHARLIE ROSE: He wants to stay out of politics?
MICHAEL MULLEN: He does want to stay out of politics. He also -- he wants to do the right thing for Pakistan. And he’s in a very, very tough spot. He also knows his country well, and so obviously he’s paying a lot of attention to this as well, as we all are. And I’m just hopeful that this doesn’t turn into another crisis in Pakistan.
This is straightforward: those pushing the "coup" question have turned Mullen's 10 exchanges with Kiani over the last year, which include recent meetings in Washington and Kabul, into 10 phone calls from Mullen to Kiani in recent days. Those discussions were on broader military matters, notably the handling of the insurgency in the Northwest Frontier Provinces.
The US Government does not want a coup in the middle of this crisis. If Washington thinks Zardari is too damaging to stay in power, then it will look for his replacement, but at a quieter time and a less dramatic process.
If those jumping to coup conclusions had listened to the next section of Mullen's interview, they would have gotten to the real heart of the story:
CHARLIE ROSE: How do you get the army chief of staff, Kiyani, to take those military forces and use them not in anticipation of conflict with India, but more in pursuit of forces that want to destabilize Pakistan?
MICHAEL MULLEN: Well, first of all, he recognizes that he has an extremist threat in Pakistan. They’ve lost many, many citizens. And in fact, there’s -- if you look at the suicide bombings which have occurred over the last year or so, they’ve actually moved towards -- and a couple of them have actually occurred in Islamabad. So he recognizes there’s a serious extremist terrorist threat inside his country, and in fact his forces have fought very hard this year up in Bajaur, which is in Mohmand, up on the western border.
Clearly, the Mumbai attacks in India put him in a position where he had to focus more on the Indian border, and he has. I mean, he’s a chief who’s got threats coming from both directions. It’s very important -- and I give President Musharraf and Prime Minister Singh a lot of credit - because they actually detentioned [sic] that border during President Musharraf’s time, and in fact the tourism started to flourish, there was trade which started to flourish across that border, and all that got suspended with the Mumbai attacks.
So General Kiyani knows what he has to do. He needs to move more troops to the west and he needs to train them in counterinsurgency.
There you have it. As Josh Mull has noted on this site, the Obama Administration wants to keep the Pakistani military focused on the "sanctuary" in the northwest and wants the Pakistani Government firmly behind Pakistani, US, and joint operations there. There should be no conflict with India distracting from that effort.
And --- here is the point of the US policy towards the Long March --- there should be no distraction of domestic politics from that overriding objective. So Washington's efforts over the last few days have been not to topple Zardari but to get the President to back off from a showdown with political rivals like Nawaz Sharif and to be careful in his handling of the lawyers' movement.
If Zardari continues to see political and judicial opponents as Public Enemies Number One, and thus loses the plot on the approach to the "real" insurgency, then he may have to go.
But not now.
Reader Comments (3)
My guess is this story comes from the Saudis, and it's connected to the GEO crack down as well. First the narrative doesn't have the full spectrum dominance or unintentional irony of an American K Street/Madison Avenue operation, nor does it have the uncomfortable morbidity of an intelligence service plant. Rather it seems this is a move by the Saudis (and their subsidiary GEO News - think FOX/PressTV) to discredit the Zardari government. Why?
The Saudis heavily back the Sharif boys who were recently disqualified from ever holding office again. The coup story broadcast over GEO to its populist viewers is essentially saying, "hey, why trust that lame old civilian government when they disqualify Sharif, the Army can just undo whatever it wants, whenever it wants." Presumably that's when the Pakistani military ripped GEO off the air (possibly with the help of US military/intelligence - I don't know the Pakistanis' capability on this). That's also when the backers of the coup narrative began to show themselves. Saudi-backed governors from the FATA and the NWFPs all railed publicly against the GEO censorship, along with Captain Obvious himself Nawaz Sharif.
With that said, I also wouldn't put it past Mullen to be straight up lying. He's not elected and he's not under oath, he's US military elite engaged in a clandestine, hot war in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Charlie Rose ain't exactly Larry King, but that doesn't make the interview super credible or anything. If the Obama Administration was really concerned about this story we'd have Hillary Clinton on Meet the Press denying, denying, denying. Instead, we have Mullen (what a HUGE ratings grab) slipped onto Charlie Rose to casually dismiss a rumor that may or may not be brewing among foreign policy elites.
I don't know, I could really go either way on this one, but I'm leaning much heavier toward it being a Saudi PR tantrum, not a close call for democracy in Pakistan.
UPDATE: I should have mentioned that the coup story BROKE on GEO News. My rambling makes a lot more sense with that little detail. :)
Josh,
Thank you so much --- I didn't realise the original story came from GEO, which is essential context. The read on the Saudi motives is vital --- it reinforces my opinion that the US Gov't is holding out against a coup, as they would risk losing out to Riyadh.
S.
I thank thee that I am none of the wheels of power but I am one with the living creatures that are crushed by it. bcizoi bcizoi - moncler outlet.