Iran Special: The Green Movement, the Regime, and "the West" (Nabavi)

Journalist and satirist Ebrahim Nabavi writes for Rooz Online:

More than a year has passed since the beginning of the Green Movement. Today, I would like to tell you things about the Green Movement that you might be less aware of.

Firstly, the Green Movement is not a religious movement, but it cannot be called a secular movement either, yet it can be called a non-religious movement with religious leaders. This is one of the ways for the growth of democracy in the Islamic world. The Green Movement is occurring in a religious society, not because we are in love with religion, no, we are not at all fond of a religious society, but we live in reality and whoever tells you that Iran’s future will be a secular society, do not take their comment seriously for the next fifty years. Even after fifty years, only Henry Kissinger will be able to predict tomorrow.

Secondly, the Green Movement has a distinct leadership. Mir Hossein Mousavi is the leader of this Movement, but he and other leaders of the Movement such as [Mohammad] Khatami and Karroubi have never claimed to be the leaders of the Movement, because the leaders of the Movement have a completely reciprocal relationship with its supporters.

Fifty percent of content of Mir Hossein Mousavi’s thoughts, demands, language and words have changed in the past year, not because he lacks a structured thought, but because he has maintained his interaction and dialogue with the supporters and especially the mid-ranked leaders of the Movement.

Thirdly, the Green Movement is a peaceful. If in the past year, thousands of Iranians have been imprisoned, wounded, exiled, tortured and more than a hundred people have been killed on the streets, it is all because of the regime’s fear of the Movement’s expansion and its widespread use of violence against the people. This year on the 12th of June, the people had planned to take to the streets on the anniversary of the coup, but despite article 27 of the constitution, the government did not grant authorisation.

The Green Movement’s goal is not to bring a ten-thousand strong crowd to the street and thus bring about tens of casualties and hundreds of prisoners. When three million people take to the streets, even a great army is incapable of controlling them, but when five thousand people take to the streets, they can be controlled using five hundred people.

Fourthly: The regime is currently faced with many conflicts. After the anniversary of Ayatollah Khomeini’s death which resulted in a dispute between Khomeini’s grandson and Ahmadinejad, a dramatic loss has been occurring in the pro-government camp. A great number of parliament members will return towards the people and sizeable portion of diplomats will probably not return to Iran. Right now, the regime loses between two to five of the leader’s most important aides and on the other side, the Green Movement is able to find more cohesion and is transforming from a chaotic crowd, to a distinct organisation. For a month now, the atmosphere for activity within Iran has opened up and particularly in the cities; there is a chance for the Green Movement to spread the word, especially using graffiti on walls and distributing fliers. All of this is because of an intense dispute among the conservatives themselves. We pray for their disputes to continue.

Fifthly, I said all this to bring the discussion to the issue of media. In Iran, seven channels, tens of radio stations, hundreds of newspapers and thousands of websites working under the supervision of the government, the conservatives, the leader and Ahmadinejad, tell tens of lies every minute. In addition, thirty Persian speaking television stations based in Los Angeles obstruct the people’s thinking by repetitively broadcasting old movies.

On the other hand, the government attacks the internet via filtering and forming the Internet Cyber Army and prevents TV images and radio waves to be reached to the Iranian people through jamming, while independent newspapers have long been shut down. Our main concern is launching a channel for transferring the breath of freedom into the country. For a while now, the Americans have talking of creating a censorship-free internet environment in Iran: Mr [Senator John] McCain is trying very hard in this regard, each time he mentions this, a few more Iranian journalists are arrested, and of course, nothing important happens.

Sixthly, a great constraint for us in launching independent media outside the country is that we cannot receive funds from outside Iran. Using foreign money here is like releasing gazelle into a field with thousands of hunters, some of whom might use tanks to hunt the gazelle. Receiving financial aid from Europe or the United States is like firing a bullet to the head of our colleagues in Iran. Also, my bitter and personal experiences with BBC Persian, VOA, Radio Zamaaneh and Deutsche Welle show that all Persian-language media take into account considerations with respect to their governments.

At times, the damage brought about by a TV station such as the BBC is a thousand times more than its benefits. They have taken away two hundred of our best writers who had hundreds of thousands of readers and turned them into the employees of an organisation which for many years has been viewed with suspicion by those Iranians that believe that the English are responsible for all the evil that occurs in Iran. Besides, the constant intervention of the Europeans in media affairs that are run with European money causes the practical destruction of this media. One those examples are Radio Zamaneh, which has collapsed. After months of efforts, Euronews has still not reached any point and it seems that it has yet to find Persian translators for its employees.

Seventhly, unfortunately, because of using Iranian advisors from previous centuries, many western governments harm the current pro-democracy movement instead of helping it. Three or four years ago, we faced problems for transferring a thousand Euros from France to Belgium because we worked for an opposition website. At the same time, in Europe, millions of Euros of Iranian funds belonging to the regime and the Revolutionary Guards were being used for various purposes that went against legal treaties of the UN. For many years, we have explained that we are not terrorists and in fact oppose terrorism, but the bank’s representative had focused on the word “Iran” which caused us to remove “Iran” from the name of our company.

As we speak, thousands of dollars in Canada and the United States are given to individuals in the name of “helping Iranian journalists”. Nevertheless, not only do these individuals not do anything for the Freedom Movement in Iran, but they effectively create legal dossiers against journalists inside the country. Some right-wing newspapers in Iran are being fed by money provided by you.

Eighthly, the Iranian state uses three methods for preventing any political activity: censorship, causing a lack of trust and obstructing the formation of organisation. These are the three most important measures taken by the Intelligence Ministry. However, our great chance is the internet. In practice and especially under the right conditions, the internet makes up for our three information and intelligence limitations and works for us like an organisation; it eliminates censorship and paves the way for mutual trust.

But the danger of the internet and is our great problem is the penetration of intelligence elements who access our data and are become aware of our plans. This is easier when it come to social networks and more difficult with main inboxes and p websites. Some of the best weapons at the disposal of the Green Movement in Iran are the Balatarin website, Facebook, and Twitter. Despite the fact that the Balatarin website was also used by radical supporters of the government and the radical supporters of a military strike against Iran, it was a powerful source for quickly spreading information and news across the country. In reality, in the past year, the following websites, Balatarin, Facebook, Rooz Online, and Jaras [Rah-e-Sabz] have acted as news websites and have been able to make up for the lack of organisation and to break the atmosphere of censorship. When we took to the streets, we had already spoken our minds on Facebook.

Ninth, despite all the problems that we are facing right now, our work is being followed in Iran because of our use of converting media. Many of our television and internet messages are sent to those lacking access to the internet, via paper fliers and video CDs. Following Ahmadinejad’s 12 June coup, we tried to speak with the media that was close to the people’s ears and through such means; we are currently successful to a certain extent

Tenthly, it might be useful to note that the belief a great number of our friends in the west is based on the belief behind the Islamic Republic’s propaganda. Contrary to the Iranian regime’s propaganda, it is not true that all villagers support Ahmadinejad. Half of them are, and nevertheless, our rural areas account for less than twenty percent of the population of Iran.

Contrary to the prevalent notion, the Freedom Movement of Iran is not a Movement of middle class; it is a completely widespread Movement. Most of the Movement’s casualties and prisoners are from the poor and most of the Army’s commanders are millionaires and billionaires. Mostly because of the current regime in the country, most of the educated are considered as relatively poor by others and the rich class of the country belong to a class of rulers and military and religious figures. Contrary to the prevalent propaganda, the most important group that fight against the regime and struggle for the separation of religion and politics are the moderate religious and Islamo-democratic groups, while a great segment of the government’s supporters’ ties with the state is based on their dependence on government money and they have no religious tendencies.

Eleventh, based on what has been said, we would like to ask those Europeans who think they wish to help us, “Think more about yourselves.” If the bomb that threatens the livelihoods of us as Iranians explodes, it will place the whole planet under threat.

The main problem for Iranians today, is information. We must reflect accurate news inside Iran. In doing so, we might be able to give this news to the entire world too. We do not ask money from you, but try to provide the possibility for breaking free from tyranny. From you as Europeans, we would like to ask you to give us permission to have a television station. We would like you to respond to us a little sooner. We do not want you to have a troubled conscience by asking us “What do you require?” and then abandon us in a cloud of uncertainty. The main requirement for Freedom Movement in Iran is awareness and, specifically, a television channel for conveying the news accurately and completely.

You have experienced the bitter taste of fascism during the Second World War. You know what danger is. We are in the same position as you. Within Iran, the sphere of life is more lively, everything is more dynamic and millions of people want to get rid of the Satan. The mere getting rid of the Satan will suffice, and then, they themselves will choose if they want to enter hell or heaven.

Iran Interview: Ahmad Batebi "The Green Movement Goes Underground"

Persian2English have now published the third part of a recent interview with activist Ahmad Batebi, now living in exile in the US. The first two parts, “People’s Movement Will Stay Alive with Knowledge and Information” and  "The Green Movement and Mousavi" are already posted on EA:

Maryam: Everybody had high expectations for 11 February (22 Bahman). However, big demonstrations were not materialized. Security forces cracked down on a large scale. Why weren’t people able to protest similarly to Ashura (27 December) and Student Day (7 December)?

Batebi: As I mentioned, the more time that passes, the more immune the regime becomes [to protests], and they learn the ways to crackdown on and suppress the people. Yet, there were [still] several demonstrations.

One of the developments after the election was that the Ministry of Intelligence, which is the main security establishment, was not able to control people through its traditional methods and operations. This is when the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) entered the scene. The IRGC practically took control of security operations and also took the Intelligence under its supervision. The IRGC operates much more ruthlessly- it beats and kills people.

We saw the events that unfolded on 27 December. One of the problems that the IRGC faced was that it had trusted the Ministry of Intelligence and had accepted the data and statistics that the Ministry had provided on the number of people who were or would be gathering in main squares. It had divided tasks and forces based on this data, which was somehow incorrect. Moreover, people had changed their strategy. Those who were leading people from outside Iran had planned to undo all the calculations, and the regime failed in controlling the people. This resulted in the IRGC acting more professionally the next time. It deployed much more forces and planned to take control on 11 February.

The Green Movement does not have [access to] radio, TV, or newspapers, and cannot spread the news and information like the Islamic Republic. The difference between 27 December and 11 February was that on Ashura, there were religious ceremonies held all over, so one could be anywhere in the city. People attended these ceremonies and, therefore, the movement was able to be everywhere. However, on 11 February , the routes [of the demonstrations] were predetermined. If the movement wanted to show itself it had to take these routes. [Security forces] had closed all the roads from the day before.

One of my friends who was in Iran said that he was with a friend who had a Basij membership card. They were going to attend the rally. He said, “We saw groups of Basijis who had come from Qom, Mashhad, etc. and they were not letting any of us in. The organization was so strong that strangers were not able to enter. The more we approached Azadi Square, the tighter the security became, and they stopped us before reaching the square. We told them we are Basijis. They asked us for the secret word.” This shows they had a password so no outsider would be able to enter.

Now the question is, why is it that the Green Movement could not succeed? [Regime forces] had organized way ahead of time. They had formed teams to prevent any outsider from joining the rally and they closed all the routes. When the ruling establishment is so powerful, this is the result. Before, people attended protests on 20-30 specific days and they were successful. On this one day, the people were not able to because of the regime’s organization. This was not due to the movement’s weakness, but it was because we did not have the same resources that the regime has at its disposal.

Maryam: After 11 February many supporters of the Iranian people’s movement in the West stepped aside. I do not want to say that we are witnessing a decline, but the situation is calming down. Why has this happened? Is it all because of 11 February?

Batebi: The outside world’s understanding of the movement is very different from what is happening inside Iran. The western world or the media think that movement means demonstrations, and if the latter doesn’t exist, nor does the former. However, we know that the culture of the Iranian people is different than that of the outside world. The fact that [the Iranian people] write slogans [on walls and banknotes] in the colour green and distribute cassettes and CD’s demonstrates that the movement is alive. The movement is learning how stay alive without incurring deaths and arrests. The movement is transferring from one form to another.

In all social movements across the world, you see that when a movement goes underground, for a very short period of time, the activists become slower. This is not sluggishness, but rather the period of transformation. We are passing through this phase. This time, when we have protests in June, we will have less people arrested, less people killed, and that is how people will learn. It is natural that the government learns how to suppress people and the people learn how to resist.



Maryam: You mean that the movement is going underground?

Batebi: Yes, it is, and it should. In the 1979 revolution, too, the movement became underground. That is why it succeeded.



Maryam: What do you say to the argument that western media does not focus on human rights [in Iran] and focuses more on the nuclear issue?

Batebi: Well, it is true, but we cannot tell the world to be the way we want it to be. The world is saying that this is my language and these are the issues I pay attention to. We cannot say, “Why do you pay attention to this issue [instead of the other one]?”  We have to see what they want to broadcast. Then we need to publish that and present it to the media in a package that follows [a specific] format.

The nuclear issue is the world’s concern. It is the concern of world governments, and this concern is reflected to the media from the top. The Iranian nuclear issue is important for the international community because it can endanger the world’s security. Governments pay attention to it and convey this concern to the media. However, the human rights issue is conveyed to the media from the bottom, and then the media can, in turn, convey it to the governments. We have to keep the media updated on all the instances of human rights abuses. We should send the media films, reports, translations [of the news], and articles. This will result in the media publishing and broadcasting [news on human rights issues in Iran]. Consequently, governments will pay attention.